Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by runningcyclist View Post
    Hi all.

    Smaryka, have you posted in LFGSS recently? Maybe you've got a twin

    I'm 4'11 and am currently on the hunt for the 'perfect' OTP road bike. I was convinced a smaller frame would be the way to go, but have currently ridden a Trek 1.2 47cm which was uncomfortable in comparison with a Cannondale 48/50. It appears I'm more leg than arms.

    I knew it was difficult to find bikes for shrimps, just hadn't realised how difficult
    Runningcyclist, what bike did you end up getting?

    I discovered my perfect 650c bike when I took my old Cervelo P2SL TT frame (not available in Europe I don't think) and built it up as a road bike. Now it's my #1 racing bike, fast and furious with the added aero bonus. It's like climbing aboard a penny-farthing when I jump back on the "big" 700c Soloist again.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Muirenn View Post
    Really not sure what this means, but glad you like your bike

    And I thought pennies were small!
    Ha ha, a penny-farthing is one of these:


    Never actually ridden one but I imagine it feels gigantic underneath you, and hard to get the wheels going initially.

    My 650c wheels are so quick to accelerate that when I jump back on my 700c bike it just takes a bit of getting used to again, I don't seem to have that quickness in turning the wheels round, especially going up steep hills. Would never go back to racing my 700c bike in crits again!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    Quote Originally Posted by smaryka View Post
    My 650c wheels are so quick to accelerate that when I jump back on my 700c bike it just takes a bit of getting used to again, I don't seem to have that quickness in turning the wheels round, especially going up steep hills. Would never go back to racing my 700c bike in crits again!
    This is more likely because the bike fits you than the size of its wheels.... I'm short too, but I've an odd body shape and my small 700c bike fits better. For me that one feels like it accelerates, climbs faster etc. (of course the way my 650 bike is built up these days its no wonder, its a bit of a pig compared to my race bike right now at 22.5 lbs)
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by Eden View Post
    This is more likely because the bike fits you than the size of its wheels.... I'm short too, but I've an odd body shape and my small 700c bike fits better. For me that one feels like it accelerates, climbs faster etc. (of course the way my 650 bike is built up these days its no wonder, its a bit of a pig compared to my race bike right now at 22.5 lbs)
    It's a bit of both I think -- the 650c wheels are lighter, so that's an advantage, and the smaller diameter means less energy to get them going or to speed them up (see this page for the explanation). But then you lose out with the higher rolling resistance on the small wheels, so it takes more effort to keep them going and you lose more energy on bumps and rough road.

    It's interesting because both my frames are the same size (48cm) by the same manufacturer (Cervelo). I wrote a blog post about this a while back comparing the two here. Biggest differences are that the 650c bike has a lower front end (smaller diameter wheel and its short headtube as a TT bike), and the seattube angle is steeper. No toe overlap as I have on the 700c bike. Both bikes descend and corner really well, but the lower front end on the 650c bike makes it a bit more aggressive for racing.

    I think Cervelo's done a great job making a 700c bike in small sizes though, given the inherent geometry problems with that. After all there is a market for those wheels on a small frame, so it's nice that a manufacturer has thought through the problems and tried to find the best solution rather than compromise on handling. They also make a 650c carbon model (the RS), though the headtube on that is quite long so more a comfort than a racing bike.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    Quote Originally Posted by smaryka View Post
    It's a bit of both I think -- the 650c wheels are lighter, so that's an advantage, and the smaller diameter means less energy to get them going or to speed them up (see this page for the explanation). But then you lose out with the higher rolling resistance on the small wheels, so it takes more effort to keep them going and you lose more energy on bumps and rough road.

    It's interesting because both my frames are the same size (48cm) by the same manufacturer (Cervelo). I wrote a blog post about this a while back comparing the two here. Biggest differences are that the 650c bike has a lower front end (smaller diameter wheel and its short headtube as a TT bike), and the seattube angle is steeper. No toe overlap as I have on the 700c bike. Both bikes descend and corner really well, but the lower front end on the 650c bike makes it a bit more aggressive for racing.

    I think Cervelo's done a great job making a 700c bike in small sizes though, given the inherent geometry problems with that. After all there is a market for those wheels on a small frame, so it's nice that a manufacturer has thought through the problems and tried to find the best solution rather than compromise on handling. They also make a 650c carbon model (the RS), though the headtube on that is quite long so more a comfort than a racing bike.
    The 650 accelerates thing is pretty much a myth. On paper it may look good, but in the real world its just doesn't show results. For a while it was very much in vogue for triathletes to all use 650's. They found in the end it was better to go with the best fit they could get and 650's are again rare on tri-bikes unless you actually need them. (good for me though... easy to find cheap 650 wheels for my TT bike these days)

    The best thing is to go with a bike that fits *you* the best. If 650's are the way to go, and for many of us shorties they may well be then go with them. If 700's work better, like they do for me, don't discount them just because you happen to be short. Now I *do* have a TT bike with 650's, but that is a whole different animal. I wouldn't be able to get aero on a bigger bike and the position is quite different too.
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Eden View Post
    The best thing is to go with a bike that fits *you* the best. If 650's are the way to go, and for many of us shorties they may well be then go with them. If 700's work better, like they do for me, don't discount them just because you happen to be short. Now I *do* have a TT bike with 650's, but that is a whole different animal. I wouldn't be able to get aero on a bigger bike and the position is quite different too.
    Yep agreed there but since the neutral service car won't always carry my 650c spare wheels I've had to compromise in some races and race the 700c bike.

    I like 'em both, I feel they both work for me and fit me for various reasons... it's nice to have the option anyway. Thinking about whether I should try 650c for cross too but I wonder about the "rolling over rough ground" thing, whether I'll actually have to work harder with smaller wheels or not.

    One of these days I'll get a custom-made TT bike with 24-inch wheels just so I can get myself even more aero in front (can you imagine the size of the chainrings I'd need though... ) Would be a cool experiment anyway.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    102
    Having just done a (UK) market search to recommend a bike to a small woman (4'11"), I found that one or two of the Treks come in a 43cm w/ 650c wheels. The effective top tube is about 48.5cm - so lovely & short. It's not intuitive or very clear which bikes come in this small size - but if you go onto the Trek site & go through all the road bikes, you will see most come with 47cm as the smallest - but a couple come smaller.

    We frequently have small women customers (as a 5'1" myself I know the frustrations) & there aren't a lot of off the peg 650c bikes available in the UK - sometimes you can find a 43cm Cannondale on ebay - but I dont' think they make one new anymore.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    102
    Having just done a (UK) market search to recommend a bike to a small woman (4'11"), I found that one or two of the Treks come in a 43cm w/ 650c wheels. The effective top tube is about 48.5cm - so lovely & short. It's not intuitive or very clear which bikes come in this small size - but if you go onto the Trek site & go through all the road bikes, you will see most come with 47cm as the smallest - but a couple come smaller.

    We frequently have small women customers (as a 5'1" myself I know the frustrations) & there aren't a lot of off the peg 650c bikes available in the UK - sometimes you can find a 43cm Cannondale on ebay - but I dont' think they make one new anymore.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •