
Originally Posted by
socalgal59
But the real question is how practical is it to essentially wear a skirt to play sports? I don't recall Lance Armstrong wearing a skirt to win any one of his seven Tour de France titles. To my recollection, Tiger Woods hasn't worn a skirt to win any of his majors. Kobe Bryant doesn't wear skirts on the basketball court. So why the heck are manufacturers mocking women athletes by producing skirts for us to play? I think most women just want functional, practical, quality sports apparel.
No, but last time I was aware of it, LPGA golfers got to wear shorts on the course, unlike the men who are forced to sweat it out in their pressed slacks. 
I don't see it as mockery at all. In fact, I find it empowering to have more choices in what I wear. Let's face it, even if Lance Armstrong wanted to wear a skirt for a TdF stage, society wouldn't let him live that down (not saying that's right, that's just how it is). I embrace the fact that I can wear shorts when I want or a skirt when I want. No, I probably wouldn't wear a skirt in a race, but a huge proportion of athletes are not necessarily competitive.
I wore a cycling skirt on a recent charity ride, and I think it was plenty functional, practical, and I felt "fun" wearing it. Sure, most of the time I wear shorts, but sometimes I'm glad to have "cute" athletic apparel, too, and that's not mutually exclusive with functional/practical/high quality in my experience.
'09 Jamis Satellite Femme | stock Jamis Road Sport -- road
'08 Trek 7.2FX | Terry Cite -- commuter
'77 Raleigh Grand Prix mixte | stock Brooks (vinyl) -- just for fun!