Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 27

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    There is a shop here in Seattle which routinely and repeatedly sells bikes that are far too small.

    I hate trying to fit those, because I have to break the news that there is nothing to be done. Someone paid as much as they could afford, the shop put them up on a stand, "fitted" them, and sent them out the door on a bike way too small. (How about a guy over six feet tall on a 50cm frame? How could that shop let him out the door? He paid full price *and* got "fitted" at the shop. "Reamed" is more like it...)

    The folks I try to fit who have purchased their tiny bikes from that shop in the last year, I suggest they try to get an exchange from that shop. The ones who have had them longer I send to another shop where they can do a trade-in.

    If you have customized your bike a great deal, you can also look into buying a naked frame in your size and transferring your parts to the new frame.

    I'm sorry your bike doesn't fit. Maybe you can save it for your kid to grow into?

    Can you contact Dreambikes and ask them if they have naked frames? http://dream-bikes.org/articles/loca...hours-pg56.htm Bike projects like theirs run off profits from selling whole bikes and parts and such, and they are a great cause.
    Last edited by KnottedYet; 07-18-2010 at 11:38 AM.
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    337
    and if you get a naked frame and transfer your components, you could list your current bike/frame and try to sell it. Sadly, you typically wont get what you paid for it, but at least you'll get something out of it that you could put towards your new bike - that fits. Or even buy a previously owned bike in decent shape and transfer your components to that.
    It really sucks that they sold you that bike. When my DH got me my first bike two Christmases ago, it felt "small" to me, but they didn't have the next size up in stock. Fortunately, the LBS said I could take it and ride it for a month to see if it felt small once I was rode it some. It did - and they ordered me the next size up. I was glad they did the exchange, but I was kinda ticked that they even let me out the door with it. It NEVER felt right to me - even in the shop, on the stand it felt too small. I don't know why they even bothered telling me to take it, but I humored them and took it back the next week and had them order me the other one.
    Jenn K
    Centennial, CO
    Love my Fuji!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Not knowing what type of bike you have makes it hard to give you suggestions - if you post pics of your bike how it is set up now and/or pics of you on the bike, we can try to help.

    If there's any resale value of your bike on craigslist - you could sell it and buy another used one on craigslist that's more suitable to you.

    Yes, your core is probably weak - the first summer I started cycling I had lots of wrist/fit issues - and a lot of those were resolved as my core grew stronger. I'm quite happy bending over much further now than I was the first year. So to a certain extent - you are just gonna be uncomfortable for a while.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Traveling Nomad
    Posts
    6,763
    Ah, to have a bike that is too small....

    Not trying to minimize your problem (agree with the person who suggested that you might be able to sell it on craigslist or ebay and buy another used bike more suitable), but as a petite gal, I've definitely had too-big bikes but have never, ever had the problem of a too small bike!

    Good luck - at least you know what the problem is now, as that is half the battle.
    Emily

    2011 Jamis Dakar XC "Toto" - Selle Italia Ldy Gel Flow
    2007 Trek Pilot 5.0 WSD "Gloria" - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow
    2004 Bike Friday Petite Pocket Crusoe - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    57
    Thanks, ladies...

    Muirenn, good idea; I think I will take the issue to Trek, yes. They might throw it back at me that I took two years to discover the problem, but it's worth a shot.

    Knotted and JennK...that's really discouraging, that people consistently sell bikes too small! I mean, I don't like to have it done to me, but it's worse to hear it's done that often. It reminds me of something that happened to my partner...when I met him he happened to have this pair of sneakers that was really big. So much so that I could tell by looking at them that they couldn't fit his feet. I asked him about it, and apparently he had gone to some foofy running store in town where this was the only pair left in this style, and the salesperson just kept encouraging my partner to buy them. Now, leaving aside the fact that my partner was crazy to do so , what kind of shoe salesperson sells shoes two sizes too big?? This type of thing makes me insane.

    Some specs on the bike (and me): The guy today said it was a 15. I'm 5'3" (petite! really!) but with a longish torso and shortish legs. I don't know my inseam right now (but will before I go fit another bike!). He didn't recommend any specific brand because he wasn't trying to make a sale, which I appreciate (and couldn't make right now anyway), but said he'd recommend a 17 at least. I don't have many add-ons to the bike (just saddle, stem, bar, grips, assorted other doodads) but to _me_ it feels like a lot, since this is the first bike I bought as an adult, I never bought a bike I didn't just accept all the components on before, and I've spent a decent amount of time (and money) in various shops trying to get it all worked out. Not very encouraging to a newbie to have this experience, let me say.

    And yet, even though it's been disgustingly humid for weeks, we had such a nice ride today! I swear, if I ever get the fit of a bike worked out I'll never get off the thing.
    2008 Trek 7.5 FX WSD / Brooks B-68 (still breaking in)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    california
    Posts
    290
    it might be good to go to yet another shop and ask them if it is to small. i have had one shop say i needed a larger bike and other shops say smaller. also you could post some photos of you on your bike and probably someone here would have some good input based on that.
    Pi - 2010 Luna Orbit / brooks 68 imperial
    Fish - 2009 Marin Bear Valley/ brooks 68
    Trixie - BMX / to be decided

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    The first time I went bike shopping in real bike shops, I was sold a 13" frame women's design. I'm 5'2. Short legs, long torso. Noone should ever sell me a WSD. I very spottily used the bike because it just didn't feel right hwenever I got it, and then I sold it on craigslist and bought a used bike to replace it. And I've never bought a bike in a bike shop since.


    So if what you're riding is a mountain bike, 15" is probably about right for you to have standover clearance. My mountain bike now is about a 14".


    If you're talking about road bike sizing, a 15" is small. My smallest road frame is a 44 cm which has too short of a top tube for me, and I usually ride about a 48 cm. I can ride a 50 cm.


    But you can put longer and higher angle stems on bikes, you can switch out the handlebars to a different type that provide more reach, etc. You could put a setback seatpost on it - you put a brooks saddle on - I think those have short rails and may be contributing to sizing issues. My 44 cm frame which is too small for me has a 130 mm high angle stem on it, a setback seatpost and the saddle all the way back on the rails, soma sparrow handlebars and it's fine. It has a steeper seattube angle than I like, but I can ride it without problem.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    ha. I never noticed she had the bike in her signature.

    That bike has a pretty sloping geometry - the 15" is on a bigger bike than the seattube measurement would imply. The top tube is 533 mm... At 533, that's pretty long, which would argue for it being possible to make that bike fit - And one of her complaints is that she's leaning forward and putting too much weight on her hands making her wrist hurt. So she'd probably be better off with a shorter or higher angle stem that would allow her to sit more upright and put less weight on her hands.

    I can't comment on brooks saddles - because I've never used one - they aren't for everyone.

    If the fork is too short and her seat is way above her handlebars - then she could put a fork extender thing on:
    http://www.cambriabike.com/shopexd.a...+Tube+Extender
    (Yes, I know those aren't the best solution - but moneywise it's not too expensive one)

    That'll raise the handlebars up higher.

    This is what my soma sparrows look like on my surly - I've got a 130 mm high angle stem in combination with the bars so that they add rise to the bike. (She could possibly also just get riser flat handlebars)




    But anyways, we need pics of how the bike is set up to really make recommendations. She may be better off just selling the bike and buying a bigger used one.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Muirenn View Post
    They sold you a 15? I'm not an expert, but if that is in inches, that puts you at 38.1 cm. Pretty small. A 17 would be 43.18. (Am I doing this right people? 2.54 cm = 1 inch, but I know measurements are based on some esoteric stuff I haven't figured out yet!)

    !
    Not certain it works that way. I am 5'8" and my mountain bikes are 17 and 17.5 and the road bikes are 51 and 54. The road bikes are just different geometry. The 51 has a much longer top tube, the 54 is shorter, more WSD. It really has to do with the bike's design and where the manufacture measures height. On some bikes I can ride a 56! A person say 5'3 - 5'6 would ride a 15 mountain bike.

    I can't imagine the OP on a bike bigger than 15. A 17 would be way too tall! The most important measurement is actually length not height. If the OP can comfortably reach the shifters and brakes, then the bike is probably the right size. I would even think at 5'3" she might try a 13...
    Last edited by bcipam; 07-21-2010 at 12:22 PM.
    BCIpam - Nature Girl

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Yeah, it really depends on geometry.

    My custom road bike is a measured 47 cm c-c and a perfect fit. My off-the-shelf road bike is a nominal 50 cm, and probably pretty close to that center-to-top; a decent fit. My hybrid is 13" and definitely too big for me - even though it's a step-through frame and sold as a women's bike, it's not really built with a short reach.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Between the Blue Ridge and the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    5,203
    Quote Originally Posted by WolfGirl View Post
    The guy today said it was a 15. I'm 5'3" ...said he'd recommend a 17 at least.
    I'm 5'6" and I ride a 17" Jamis Coda Comp (straight bar road bike). My road bike is between a 49cm and 50cm.

    I would say that at 5'3", a 15" bike would be about right. I would not agree that you would need a 17" bike or bigger. Certainly not bigger! Your fit might not be just right, but don't throw that bike out just yet.

    Core strength is very important. Get working on that right away.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    I am 5'3 in my stocking feet and have the smallest Trek 7.6 FX. It is a WSD bike and if I remember correctly it is 15.5. I have long legs for my height, but for my torso the reach is slightly too long for me. It isn't TOO bad, as I learned how to ride on my Trek, but since the Wanderer (LHT) fits me so much better I am currently not riding the Trek until I decide what to do with it. It certainly isn't too small for me....

    +1 on core strength. I am still working on this but am finally starting to understand why Tuilp and others have mentioned this to me over the months since I first came to TE.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Belle, Mo.
    Posts
    1,778
    I'm 5'5" and I've had the 15 and the 17" fx. I think the 17" fits the best, but I really think I'm between sizes. I went with the 100mm stem on the 15" and 90mm on the 17". The fx is a hybrid, so the fit is more forgiving than a road bike. Maybe the fx isn't for you? Did you try a 17", because I think it sounds way to big.
    Claudia

    2009 Trek 7.6fx
    2013 Jamis Satellite
    2014 Terry Burlington

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    Posts
    1,308
    When I bought my Lemond in 2002, the shop had recommend a 53 but I went for the 51 as in the shop, it felt more comfortable. It took a year but I realized the 53 was a better fit. That said I have been riding the bike comfortably since then. It was a matter of a good fitting and then some adjustment of handlebar, seat position, pedals etc. and the bike has done me well. Thankfully I have now saved enough money to have a custom frame built but I still ride the Lemond.

    I can't imagine the bike is so small it can't be adjusted. It doesn't take that much money - find a good fitter in your area and see what he can do. $150 for a fitting is much less than money for a new frame. And having a good fitting and the measurements will keep you from repeating your mistake.

    Good luck with the problem... Loraura gave you excellent advice. Alot of what you are experiencing I believe just comes from lack of fitness. And I agree with a flat bar - unless you are biking mountain a flat bar is not good. I assume you are sitting very upright on your bike which is why you want a flat bar and a wide saddle. That positioning causes alot of the problem you are complaining of. There is a reason most roadies want to be bent forward at the waist. Using your core to support your weight will definitely take pressures off your hands and wrist. You are riding with your arms bent - correct? And wider saddles are not always better.

    And yes Hybrids are generally cruiser bikes - for short easy distance but that is not to say you can't do a century on them. I've seen people do centuries on beach cruisers (hate them). I think as you train for your century alot of problems will go away.
    Last edited by bcipam; 07-21-2010 at 12:26 PM.
    BCIpam - Nature Girl

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Trouble is that if the seat height is too high above the handlebars for her comfort, she's going to need a new fork to do much about that.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •