Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West MI
    Posts
    4,259
    Quote Originally Posted by OakLeaf View Post
    Between the Forerunner 305 and the 310XT, I'm not sure the feature differences are enough to justify the price difference, especially if you don't really need a swim watch. Pretty much the only reason I got the 310 is because I have small wrists and there's no way I could wear a 305. (Plus, I'm a gadget w**** .)
    Yeah...part of me wants the 310XT when my 305 croaks...but mostly it's just because the orange would match my bike. Really, the 305 is perfect, since I don't swim. I thought I had heard that the 310XT was easier to use during multi-sport races...something about switching between sports and transitions being more automatic (though it's pretty easy with the 305, too).
    Kirsten
    run/bike log
    zoomylicious


    '11 Cannondale SuperSix 4 Rival
    '12 Salsa Mukluk 3
    '14 Seven Mudhoney S Ti/disc/Di2

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    32
    For a newbie I'm having a hard time justifying the price difference between a 305 and 310. I'd love the have the 310 for swimming but I'm okay using the lap clock at the pool.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,023
    In my experience, the FR305 beats the Edge305 hands down. But that's just me...my Edge 305 lasted *maybe* 8 months before it went totally wonky on me and I don't use it all that much. It was also bulky for running. My FR operates MUCH more smoothly and so far, I haven't had one ounce of trouble with it (I've had it 2 months).

    It is quite big on my wrist, but it doesn't bother me. I only wear it when running/cycling...so it's not like I use it for a regular watch or anything. I find it is also plenty accurate in terms of altitude for my uses. At $125 (from an Amazon deal), it's totally worth every penny and I was highly skeptical when I ordered it due to my Edge issues.

    Now, if anyone can make a device that accurately tracks HR in the water, then I'll worry about wearing it on the swim. Other than that, I really don't care all that much. When I practice, I wear a timex watch or my lap counter. When I'm racing, I don't care about my speed, only my exertion and no watch can give me that right now.
    My new non-farm blog: Finding Freedom

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    9,324
    I would have gone with the 310 if it could accurately track my swim. I know I don't swim in a straight line and I'd love to know how much extra distance I'm doing in a race. It's a got a software update now to estimate your swim distance, which is an improvement from when it first came out.

    Veronica
    Discipline is remembering what you want.


    TandemHearts.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    257
    Just bumming because my FR 305 is getting old. the battery life has diminished to less than 4 hours of run time. Kind of a bummer on a long ride... replacement battery is $200. Technology can be so senseless.
    Loved the FR when the battery could last all day.
    Sarah

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West MI
    Posts
    4,259
    Quote Originally Posted by sarahkonamojo View Post
    Just bumming because my FR 305 is getting old. the battery life has diminished to less than 4 hours of run time. Kind of a bummer on a long ride... replacement battery is $200. Technology can be so senseless.
    Loved the FR when the battery could last all day.
    Sarah
    How old is your FR? Mine is going on 3 and the battery life still seems great...though I also leave it on the charger pretty much any time I'm not wearing it, so it's getting a full charge nearly every day. My hubby has found that his cell phone batteries last a lot longer than mine--he charges his every night and I charge mine maybe every 3-4 days and only once it gets down to 1 bar. Apparently a lot of rechargeable batteries lose their ability fully charge if they are run down too often.
    Kirsten
    run/bike log
    zoomylicious


    '11 Cannondale SuperSix 4 Rival
    '12 Salsa Mukluk 3
    '14 Seven Mudhoney S Ti/disc/Di2

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    257
    My FR is 4 years old.
    I get different advice regarding battery management. Whatever my management style, it is NOT consistent. Battery has definitely lost its ability to hold a charge. But the battery rarely has run down to no charge until recently.

    Sarah

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Katy, Texas
    Posts
    1,811

    garmin 305

    Quote Originally Posted by sarahkonamojo View Post
    Just bumming because my FR 305 is getting old. the battery life has diminished to less than 4 hours of run time. Kind of a bummer on a long ride... replacement battery is $200. Technology can be so senseless.
    Loved the FR when the battery could last all day.
    Sarah
    when I became concerned about the decreasing battery life before a couple of long rides which Iknew would take at least 10 hours with stopping time, rest breaks,etc. I bought a small rechargeable battery that I can plug into the garmin through the usb while riding by strapping it to my aerobar.

    Not that I am trying to talk anybody out of upgrading through desire or necessity. Just a thought.
    marni
    Katy, Texas
    Trek Madone 6.5- "Red"
    Trek Pilot 5.2- " Bebe"


    "easily outrun by a chihuahua."

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •