Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    20

    which Brooks for my touring bike?

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    I want to have a go at bike touring this summer, so I thought I'd transform my old hybrid bike (Specialized Crossroads) into a touring bike. Looking for saddles at the Brooks website, I wondered if I should choose the B17 S or rather the Flyer S. I have never had a saddle with springs. Are they really useful on rough roads? The Flyer is heavier than the B17. Does the advantage of greater comfort outweigh the disadvantage of higher weight?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    123
    I don't feel like the weight of the seat will matter much. I have a B17 and LOVE it. I also have a B68s and like it alot but still am not sure about the snub nose on it. I have not been on a longer ride with that one. Try one out, that's the only way you will know.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Beautiful NW or Left Coast
    Posts
    5,619
    I have several Brooks, not sure why you would get an "s" saddle.
    I just got a B68 after years of using sprung saddles, i don't think the springs add that much really, and without them, yes your saddle weighs less.
    If you go through Wallbikes, you can try the B17 and if you don't like it, you can go for the B68.. You can also ask them all these questions and get quick answers.
    oh heck i just noticed you're in Europe. Sorry about all that Wallbikes stuff. You can probably buy the saddles right from England!
    I like Bikes - Mimi
    Watercolor Blog

    Davidson Custom Bike - Cavaletta
    Dahon 2009 Sport - Luna
    Old Raleigh Mixte - Mitzi

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    I don't know much about you, but I'd suggest trying both the B17 and the B68 (for slightly wider sit bones). I suggest no "S" models, no springs.
    You really don't need springs for distance riding on roads, even on dirt or gravel roads. Springs are nice for city riding with potholes, cobblestones, etc.

    If you've never ridden a non-padded saddle before, you'd be wise to break in both the Brooks saddle and your butt for a little while before doing any really long rides on it.
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    20
    thanks for all these infos.

    so far I have been riding mountainbikes (saddles = Ariel 130 mm and Ariel 143 mm) and road bike (Bontrager saddle -> changed for a selle Italia Gel Flow Lady). I can easily ride my road bike for 4-5 hours without any complaint (even when I used the original Bontrager).

    The Brooks website says the "S" saddles are specifically for women. Why do you think that it isn't useful for a woman to buy an S saddle?

    As for the springs: I believe now that I won't need them.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    "S" stands for "Short".

    "S" saddles have short noses so skirts won't catch on them.
    People find that the "Short" saddles have rails that are far too short to allow saddle position adjustments, and some don't like the loss of control from the shortened nose.
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by KnottedYet View Post
    "S" saddles have short noses so skirts won't catch on them.
    Really? how ridiculous. thanks for the explanation. Now I know I won't need an S model. I think I will get a B 17.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Beautiful NW or Left Coast
    Posts
    5,619
    Well, they ARE using the same equipment to make saddles that they used 100 years ago, and back then, women wore volumenous skirts.
    I like Bikes - Mimi
    Watercolor Blog

    Davidson Custom Bike - Cavaletta
    Dahon 2009 Sport - Luna
    Old Raleigh Mixte - Mitzi

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    And yet one more reason that I went from an "S" Brooks to a "regular' Brooks was...
    Because the rails on the "S" were so short, there was not enough room for me to attach the Bagman saddlebag brace that I wanted to attach my Baggins Little Joe saddlebag off the saddle rails with. In this photo you can see the nice long black rails in back with the saddle shoved all the way back (love it!) and the silver Bagman clamp attached to the saddle rails. With the "S" Brooks, there was not enough room left on the back rails to attach my Bagman to, so I would have needed a rack for my Little Joe bag. Now I get to have my saddle further back the way it feels good to me, and my fave saddlebag without a rack.
    This saddlebag setup works really well for me. Mostly I keep stuff in my bag that is not super heavy- tire/tube/tool stuff, maps, extra vest, rain jacket, or shirt (warmer layers in winter), lock and cable, cell phone, etc. I can strap a loaf of bread on there too.


    One thing about Brooks saddles though is that you have to mess around with getting them leveled just right (as in nose up or down). A tiny change makes a huge difference. Once you get that angle right, it feels good. I'd also suggest starting out with the saddle pushed all the way back as a starting point. This is what Grant from Rivendell Bicycles recommends and it definitely works for me.
    Last edited by BleeckerSt_Girl; 06-18-2010 at 11:05 AM.
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    20
    Wow, that bag looks amazing. I have never seen anything like it :-)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,176
    On the tandem, the short nose is good, because with a longer one catches my pants and pulls 'em down.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •