Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 72

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lake Superior in the summer; southern WI the rest of the year
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by Skierchickie View Post
    Actually, the skating technique just came along relatively recently - I don't think it was ever outlawed. Once it caught on, they realized that nobody would do the classic techniqu
    You're right: after the 1985 world championships in Seefeld, there was a lot of talk about banning it, with the Norwegians in particular pushing for a ban. But then the FIS agreed to separate out the races instead. http://northernlightsonline.blogspot...evolution.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Perpetual Confusion and Indecision
    Posts
    488
    Quote Originally Posted by tiva View Post
    Cycle racing could become like cross-country ski racing (which has separate races for classic technique, and for the much faster skate technique--faster, but for a while, outlawed.)
    Actually, the skating technique just came along relatively recently - I don't think it was ever outlawed. Once it caught on, they realized that nobody would do the classic technique in a race, ever again, if they didn't separate out the 2 techniques. For a few years, while I was in college, you had to skate or you'd always place poorly - but either technique was allowed. Anyway, it became clear that what is now known as the classic technique would just die out if they didn't do something to save it.

    I'm not sure it's as simple as just separating cycling into "with" and "without" categories. In a perfect world, where everyone is honest, but that's the opposite of what what we're dealing with here. The guys who cheat now will cheat, for the same reasons they cheat now. Why would someone that intent on winning at all costs want to race with a bunch of dopers, given a choice? I'd be willing to bet that at least a few people who would be willing to dope would also be willing to enter the "clean" category - and have an unfair advantage. It could possibly turn into a doper's dream scenario.

    Money, money, money. And rock-star fame. But mostly money. The guys who are doping (and I'm still stubbornly and naively clinging to the dream that it isn't everyone) are doping for the money, and are willing to risk everything to do it. Why would that change? I think the consequences aren't strict enough to be a deterrent.

    Boo Floyd! Boo Floyd for doping. Boo Floyd for lying. Boo Floyd for stealing. And boo Floyd for trying to sabotage everyone else as he's going down. I really have to think there is some mental illness there - it's just too weird. My DH thinks he's getting paid.
    Last edited by Skierchickie; 05-22-2010 at 05:46 AM. Reason: Oops - sorry for the double post - computer flaked out on me

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Perpetual Confusion and Indecision
    Posts
    488
    Quote Originally Posted by tiva View Post
    Cycle racing could become like cross-country ski racing (which has separate races for classic technique, and for the much faster skate technique--faster, but for a while, outlawed.)
    Actually, the skating technique just came along relatively recently - I don't think it was ever outlawed. Once it caught on, they realized that nobody would do the classic technique in a race, ever again, if they didn't separate out the 2 techniques. For a few years, while I was in college, you had to skate or you'd always place poorly - but either technique was allowed. Anyway, it became clear that what is now known as the classic technique would just die out if they didn't do something to save it.

    I'm not sure it's as simple as just separating cycling into "with" and "without" categories. In a perfect world, where everyone is honest, but that's the opposite of what what we're dealing with here. The guys who cheat now will cheat, for the same reasons they cheat now. Why would someone that intent on winning at all costs want to race with a bunch of dopers, given a choice? I'd be willing to bet that at least a few people who would be willing to dope would also be willing to enter the "clean" category - and have an unfair advantage. It could possibly turn into a doper's dream scenario.

    Money, money, money. And rock-star fame. But mostly money. The guys who are doping (and I'm still stubbornly and naively clinging to the dream that it isn't everyone) are doping for the money, and are willing to risk everything to do it. Why would that change? I think the consequences aren't strict enough to be a deterrent.

    Boo Floyd! Boo Floyd for doping. Boo Floyd for lying. Boo Floyd for stealing. And boo Floyd for trying to sabotage everyone else as he's going down. I really have to think there is some mental illness there - it's just too weird. My DH thinks he's getting paid.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by ny biker View Post
    I disagree. Anyone who keeps on lying and lying and lying while asking total strangers to donate money to pay his legal bills deserves nothing. I just feel bad for his mother.
    What she said.........
    "Well-behaved women seldom make history." --Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

    '09 Trek WSD 2.1 with a Brooks B-68 saddle
    '11 Trek WSD Madone 5.2 with Brooks B-17

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •