Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Marin County CA
    Posts
    5,936
    You will probably notice more of a difference in the change from triple to double (is it compact or standard?) than the crank arm length. I have one bike with 170 (my old bike) and the rest have been 172.5. I really don't notice much of a difference between the two in terms of how they fit.
    Sarah

    When it's easy, ride hard; when it's hard, ride easy.


    2011 Volagi Liscio
    2010 Pegoretti Love #3 "Manovelo"
    2011 Mercian Vincitore Special
    2003 Eddy Merckx Team SC - stolen
    2001 Colnago Ovalmaster Stars and Stripes

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,372
    2.5 mm is less than 0.1 inches.
    I've gone from 170mm to 155 mm cranks, when I went from 170 to 165, I could tell no difference.
    Unless you have knee issues, I doubt you'll be able to tell any difference at all.
    The other changes you are thinking of will make much more of an impact.
    My photoblog
    http://dragons-fly-peacefully.blogspot.com/
    Bacchetta Giro (recumbent commuter)
    Bacchetta Corsa (recumbent "fast" bike)
    Greespeed X3 (recumbent "just for fun" trike)
    Strada Velomobile
    I will never buy another bike!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    I think it depends on your legs. Is there any way you can test ride a bike with 172.5mm cranks to see how it feels?

    I can ride 165, but if I'm on 167.5, I have to compromise on seat height to avoid knee issues (and wind up with calf issues instead).
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,609
    My BF and I just bought new cranks and with the arms laying side by side, it was hard to eyeball the difference between my 170 and his 175. I think different thicknesses of socks might have more of an effect than crankarm length!
    For 3 days, I get to part of a thousand other journeys.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    actually... socks won't change the effective crankarm length, they'll just raise the center of the pedal stroke. The circle will still be 5 mm longer in diameter...
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Chicago suburbs
    Posts
    1,222
    Thanks for the feedback, ladies! I'm glad to hear that, for the most part, the difference between 170 & 172.5 would be minimal. I'm not at all concerned about going from a triple to a double...as my Cervelo (that I'm selling) is a compact double, so I know what to expect. As I stated in my original post...I would only consider doing this swap, if I could do it for under $100. I don't want to sink a ton of money into a "temporary" bike. Especially since I'm actively looking for a new bike, so I'd rather put my hard-earned dollars towards that.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,414
    Perhaps it's my imagination, but I have a bike with 170s and a bike with 172.5s, and I do feel like I notice the difference. I can ride both without pain or issues, but I feel like I have a little more power with the longer cranks, while I spin a little more easily with the shorter cranks.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •