What is the point in a fixie?

[PamNY]

What are the best shoes to wear in your opinion?

Also, which model do you have? I'm thinking the MG would be the best one for me.

I have the Roma; my SO has the MG. I like the narrower deck; it's easier to handle when folded. There is slightly greater kicking efficiency, too, since your foot is closer to the deck. The MG deck is slightly lower, which also increases kicking efficiency, but IMO not as much. Over the years, we've had every model, and it's really a matter of personal preference.

Any flat or low-heeled shoe is okay; I'd start out with running shoes or something with a non-skid sole. I avoid backless shoes, like clogs.

Hope you have fun!

[twin]

I had a fixie and after having it as a commuter I had a wreck when I hit a pothole and that resulted in my partial shoulder replacement so then I decided to move to a singlespeed and did long rides and the MS 150. Then went back to a geared bike and after a couple of years have become almost exclusive to my Bianchi San Jose singlespeed. It's fun and simple and I think cute in the washed up blue color. I can use it for light touring because it has eyelets for racks. Actually it's the Bianchi Volpe frame with the rear dropouts turned backwords. Simple and fun.

[KDNYC]

As someone who has been using a bicycle in two different ways for a very long time (Centuries and commuting) I'll provide my own pov:

Is it a hipster fad? Yes, and there's some ridiculous stuff out there: no brakes? Hugely expensive bike bling? But SS/fixed bikes are popular for other reasons. I own two vintage steel bikes. One an old panasonic I bought as a beat up ss/fixed frankenbyke and the other a stripped down Trek road frame I got on the cheap. I built the Trek to be better geared, but it's also a bit large and was bought rebuild/resale and to satisfy my bike mechanic geek side I rode the panasonic as a commuter. High-geared, flies on the flats and downhill, but hard on my knees uphill, and a little too large for me. I just found a cheap used Bianchi San Jose to replace it for commuting, and am finally getting a used geared bike for some long rides this Summer.

Con: A geared bike will always be better than a fixed gear for most riding. People usually discover this at some point, which is why single-speeds are now more popular than fixed gears, and why internal hubs are growing in popularity. If you can only have one bike, make that bike fit what you need it for. A geared bike might be the best choice.

The urban/hipster fad came from bike messengers, who are seen as outlaws, are (or rather, were) omnipresent in every city, and were very fast proficient riders with simple steel bikes that were ridden hard everyday and replaced with other simple bikes when trashed. It's easier to ride a high gear downhill so long as one is strapped into the pedals. Uphill? These bikes would have a gear that can be very damaging to a weaker rider. (And it's also been damaging to messengers as well.) Couriers learn how to get through hairy traffic without stopping. Not safe, but a fixed gear messenger bike meant one front brake that basically served as an emergency device. This is not a *good* fad to emulate. But riding fixed also demands proficiency, and there's a certain pride in being able to do so -- so long as the fixie isn't hallway or wall art.

Here's some pros:
Simplicity and environmentally conscious living: Bikes were all singlespeeds once, and we all rode one as a kid, too! 24 speeds is basically the result of marketing ridiculous "improvements" to us which don't add too much to our everyday lives, except an extra trip to the bike shop now and then. A steel bike can last a few lifetimes beyond original parts. I think there is something reactive in saying "I need a bicycle to be a bicycle, I need to lock it outside, and I'll ride a beat-up singlespeed, or an inexpensive, salvaged frame with a set of wheels." In NYC, lots of people still ride old vintage geared bikes. The downside is that those who can't do their own maintenance invariably have to spend money to have a shop maintain the bike. A "tuneup" costs $100, and that might be more than the rider paid for a used bike. (Hell, my locks cost more than my bikes!). That same bike can be a simpler and more cost-effective one with a reasonable single gear ratio.

Commuting: In 15 years in DC, and in NYC where I've lived for a decade, I have rarely made more than one gear change on a commute. The 1-2 gear changes might be nice, but it also adds more maintenance work to a hard-ridden bike. (The weight savings is silly and not an issue.) A simple bike = less maintenance, less parts to steal. Internal hubs will soon supplant single-speeds. (I can't imagine doing it in SF, but DC is relatively flat and NYC basically has one long-*** hill: uptown

City riding creates unique needs: road bikes are better city riders than mtbs, but hybrids offer bombproof tires and upright riding. Flat bars and 28c gatorskins on a singlespeed/fixed gear bike makes for a fast, competent bike if the rider is already experienced.

Winter riding: I loved the grip shift flat-bar Trek multitrack hybrid I had in the '90s because I could ride it in thick gloves, but I rarely made gear changes and the gear was always midrange. A 42x16 singlespeed with winter tires is the perfect winter bike. Less parts to clean and maintain, and without the shifting one can't easily use.

Bike joy: anyone who rides eventually experiences the sense of a bike which fits the body perfectly, and a body which is inseparable from the bike. The experience is sheer joy. Fixed gears are tricky because a high gear can damage knees, but a reasonably-geared bike enhances the sense of full integration. It's not necessary to enjoy riding, but it's something that many riders become attached to and really love.

[PamNY]

Interesting discussion -- thanks. I have thought about a single speed for NYC. Especially in winter. Which reminds me -- thanks for mentioning shifting in heavy gloves. I hadn't even thought of that as something to consider.

Speaking of locks costing more than bikes, I was browsing at Paragon and eavesdropping on a kid (I suspect college student) who was explaining to his parents that yes, he was going to pay more for locks than he paid for the bike. It is kind of a shock.

[moderncyclista]

Especially in winter. Which reminds me -- thanks for mentioning shifting in heavy gloves. I hadn't even thought of that as something to consider.

That's why I like my bikes to have bar-end shifters. You never have to worry about shifting with gloves on with those.

If you go fixed, in my opinion - Single speed is better, you can coast down-hill that way. Also, you can control your pedals better on a turn and don't run into as much of the danger of banking your bike into the pavement. Since, most streets don't bank their walls like a velodrome.