Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 41

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,897
    Quote Originally Posted by oz rider View Post
    Another vote for poor taste. And a useful demonstration of Trek's attitudes to women.
    There must be something wrong with me because I've read it 3 times now and I don't see how it says anything about their attitude toward women.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    589
    Quote Originally Posted by ny biker View Post
    There must be something wrong with me because I've read it 3 times now and I don't see how it says anything about their attitude toward women.
    Not just you, I don't get the issue.

    If anything it's complimenting her abilities in my mind. April fools "jokes" are supposed to be BELIEVABLE enough that you have to do a double take or read through to the last lines (where normally April 1st or similar is mentioned). If they were demeaning women athletes then this wouldn't have been much of an April Fools stunt (it wouldn't have been "believable" in their minds).

    I don't find it particularly amusing but that's probably more from a poor execution standpoint (now Fatty's this morning was pretty good, at least from a funny writing perspective), I'm not offended by it though.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    355
    There must be something wrong with me because I've read it 3 times now and I don't see how it says anything about their attitude toward women.
    Er, they are implying it is a joke to think that women can compete with men.

    I am not overthinking this. Or dwelling. Just observing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,897
    Quote Originally Posted by lunacycles View Post
    Er, they are implying it is a joke to think that women can compete with men.

    I am not overthinking this. Or dwelling. Just observing.
    No, I saw it as pretending that a non-professional would be so very very fast that she would miraculously be chosen as an alternate for Johan Bruyneel's TdF team. Which is ridiculous regardless of whether the non-pro is a man or a woman. For so many reasons that have nothing to do with how fast said non-pro can ride.

    But maybe I just have been following Bruyneel's teams too closely over the years, up to and including this one.

    Not to mention, the joke involved the president of Trek Travel. If Trek Travel was run by a man, I'm sure it would have been about a man.

    Anyway. I really hate April fools crap. Waste of my time.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Renton, Wa
    Posts
    432
    Also, I don't think it's impossible for a woman to do the stages of the Tour de France... I'm sure some of the best women pro cyclists are more than qualified to do it, if they wanted to and trained for it, they're just not allowed to currently, which is the real tragedy (at least as I understand it, but I'll be honest, I don't pay attention to all the ins and outs of it). It would be nice to see women compete in races like this, and I would hope it's not out of the realm of possibility for the future.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    550
    I'm usually not offended by such jokes, but this one does rub me the wrong way. I don't care how they meant it, it does come off as "Ha ha, silly people, thinking a mere woman could POSSIBLY be in the Tour de France - oh get real." If they wanted to make a point about an unknown riding getting a spot on the team - use a man. I don't think this kind of sexism has a place in any US company.

    I think the joke was in very poor taste and I'm glad to support Cannondale and Surly over Trek now.
    Christine
    Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.

    Cycle! It's Good for the Wattle; it's good for the can!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    589
    Quote Originally Posted by andtckrtoo View Post
    I'm usually not offended by such jokes, but this one does rub me the wrong way. I don't care how they meant it, it does come off as "Ha ha, silly people, thinking a mere woman could POSSIBLY be in the Tour de France - oh get real." If they wanted to make a point about an unknown riding getting a spot on the team - use a man. I don't think this kind of sexism has a place in any US company.

    I think the joke was in very poor taste and I'm glad to support Cannondale and Surly over Trek now.
    But that's just as sexist "use a man". Seriously, this stuff does go both ways. They chose to use the PRESIDENT of Trek Travel; it couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that she's overseeing an entire branch of the company and is clearly highly respected and valued to be offered such a position (and incidentally in charge of the branch that happened to publish this) and probably had something to do with it (or at the very least approved it). Nope, gotta be because she's a girl and that makes it somehow more absurd

    99.9% of guys aren't physically capable of riding in the Tour, 99.9% of girls aren't either. Really lacking to see the distinction in why one is more absurd than the other if you take the WHOLE of recreational/no-pro cyclists (or population) into account (and not just the pros, which, you will realize, they DIDN'T use a PRO women cyclist...)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,867
    Quote Originally Posted by ny biker View Post
    There must be something wrong with me because I've read it 3 times now and I don't see how it says anything about their attitude toward women.
    I'm with you.

    If a woman was invited to ride in the TdF I would be really really surprised. I wouldn't doubt her ability because if someone knows something about it, and who can compete in it, it's the teams who do. I really doubt it is going to happen any time soon, if ever, so if it is such an unprecedented thing, they're not really poking fun at inability of women to compete in it. It's just too far out of the realm of possibility and that's why it's humorous.

    Karen
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    insidious ungovernable cardboard

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •