Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Between the Blue Ridge and the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    5,203

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    I'm too lazy to figure out what my ideal weight would be using that formula given earlier, but I'm 5'6". Of course, height matters!

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    When I was leg-pressing 220# and doing a whole lot of upper body work as well, I was still lighter than that ratio by a couple of pounds, and I'm definitely happier on hills now that I'm doing less strength training. It's not my optimum weight for anything, except maybe bodybuilding for appearance, which just isn't my thing.

    A couple of weeks ago I posted that thing from the NYT about finding one's ideal weight, which according to the article, even today is a matter of trial and error for every athlete. Obviously different body types will be better at different sports, and even at different disciplines within a sport (compare Olympic sprinters with Olympic marathoners, or the hill climbing specialists on a cycling team with the time trialists or the sprinters).
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    2,543
    I get regular testing done on my body composition. I know its not all 100% accurate, but I usually come out with 145lbs lean body weight. Does that mean if I had 0% body fat, I would weigh 145 lbs? Just wondering. That would put me 10 lbs over my 2:1 ratio.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    25
    0% body fat would put you at 145lbs of lean solid muscle......

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Salt Lake
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by TryingisDying View Post
    0% body fat would put you at 145lbs of lean solid muscle......
    Wait, huh? What about bones, water, and organs? Not that organs would be functioning any more at 0% bf...

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    25
    Damn..lol I think that is figured in there....I can check at work. I do this for a living...well kinda...Let me ask what the figuration is...

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •