Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    98

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    Quote Originally Posted by jjkkee View Post
    I am shopping for a new lightweight hybrid bike. Mine is about 30 pounds and hard to lift up on my car bike rack. I would like to find something under 24 pounds but do not want a lightweight road bike. Any thoughts?
    You're not alone! Betty also wanted a lighter bike so she could put it on her car rack. Betty's custom "hybrid" bike weighs just 23 pounds.

    From http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/betty.htm :

    "This is Betty. She's 78 years old and loves to ride. This October (2000) she and a friend are taking an Elderhostel tour of Wisconsin on their bikes. She can't lift her leg as high as she used to, and she had trouble stepping over the frame to get on and off her old bike. Even the frames on girl's bikes are too high for her. She didn't want to stop riding just because of that. She also wished her bike weighed less. Not for performance, but to make it easier for her to lift the bike onto her car's trunk rack when she takes it out on the weekends. To solve these two problems I built her a custom bike with much lower step through height and much lighter weight than her old bike. Betty's bike is almost two years old now. She estimates it's got about 2000 miles on it, since she hasn't been putting as many miles in recently as she used to."

    There are photos at the link above.

    Maybe try a bike shop that has a scale and just weigh bikes to compare?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Quote Originally Posted by SadieKate View Post
    We keep those fancy devices in the car also. They aren't just for home use.
    I just took another look at it, it FOLDS. Cool! I don't have near the problem getting my bike on the rack away from home, it has to do with the angle of sidewalks and so forth. It is interesting though... hmmmm

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Maybe some of the trek fx's are lighter.

    And as a 5'1 person with a "higher" car, even if it's only a subaru outback... I have no desire to lift a heavy bike on to it. I can put my titanium bike on the roof no problem, it's maybe 16 lbs and lifting it over my head and strapping it on isn't bad. I can take it down too. Both without a stool. But I am literally holding on to the chain stay and one of the bike tubes and holding it straight up over my head, arms fully extended.

    Anything much heavier than that and I start worrying about the car in case I drop something. Lifting a 24 inch POS girls mountain bike on the roof to take it to my neice (damned thing musta weighed almost 30 lbs) was a pain in my neck and required a stool. As did a mountain bike (maybe 25 lbs?)

    I use a hitch rack normally... and while I don't have a problem lifting 25 lb bikes on to it... It's a bit of a pain, because the arms of the hitch rack are above my shoulders and then because my bikes are small frame with water bottle holders, frame pumps, it's a bit difficult to maneuver into the arms because a bit of a tight fit.

    I've got a fair amount of upper body strength and have no problem carrying heavy things... I just find it awkward lifting things over my shoulders or head over a certain weight, so I don't think the ops request for a lighter bike is unreasonable. And I find my surly annoyingly heavy at 25 lbs in comparison to all my other bikes.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Grand Ledge, MI
    Posts
    4
    I do not want the very narrow road tires because I am afraid of slipping on wet leaves and having to be so careful of curbs and RR tracks. I also don't want a road bike so light that it is hard to control. The bike does not need to be "extra sturdy" just stable for riding pavement and maybe on gravel. My rides to date are under 50 miles but I do plan on some longer rides this summer. Is there a road bike that is between 18-24 pounds?

    Whoever pasted the picture of the step stool - thank you - so far it is best idea yet (and the least expensive). Thank you everybody for you patience.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eden View Post
    [SIZE="1"]

    The question I'd have for the OP is why a hybrid - is it for the upright posture (if yes then a cyclocross bike is out), is it for the sturdiness - and if so why does the bike need to be extra sturdy. Is it just that wide tires make her feel more comfortable and stable? Is all of her riding on pavement or does the bike need to be able to handle gravel/dirt? More info would definitely help in making suggestions.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    Quote Originally Posted by jjkkee View Post
    Whoever pasted the picture of the step stool - thank you - so far it is best idea yet (and the least expensive). . . .
    You're welcome but please get the lingo right. It is a High Tech Bike and Ski Removal Device.

    Even my (nearly 61 yr old) 6'2" shoulder-challenged hubby likes one.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    Quote Originally Posted by jjkkee View Post
    I do not want the very narrow road tires because I am afraid of slipping on wet leaves and having to be so careful of curbs and RR tracks. I also don't want a road bike so light that it is hard to control. The bike does not need to be "extra sturdy" just stable for riding pavement and maybe on gravel. My rides to date are under 50 miles but I do plan on some longer rides this summer. Is there a road bike that is between 18-24 pounds?

    Whoever pasted the picture of the step stool - thank you - so far it is best idea yet (and the least expensive). Thank you everybody for you patience.
    A Cyclocross or touring bicycle may be just what you are looking for. Both are a bit heavier than your average performance road bike (though I must say 18 lbs isn't all that heavy - generally only expensive race bikes get into the range of 14-15 lbs) and both can accept wider tires. On the other hand they have road type geometry which, if you can adapt to drop handle bars, will make them more comfortable for longer rides. Cyclocross tires (which often can be mounted on touring bikes - I had some on my old Trek 420 for winter use) come in a wide array of treads, including some that are quite knobby. Touring bikes also tend to have longer wheel bases and some geometry changes as well, which make them feel less twitchy, more stable, especially under load. Both bikes tend to be supplied with sturdier wheels because they need to handle more weight and in the case of cyclocross, the possibility of riding over obstacles.
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,058
    How old is your hybrid? My two-year old hybrid is lighter than my 10-year old hybrid. You can change tires on any bike, so shop for a frame you like, then have them change to the tires you are comfortable with
    "Well-behaved women seldom make history." --Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

    '09 Trek WSD 2.1 with a Brooks B-68 saddle
    '11 Trek WSD Madone 5.2 with Brooks B-17

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Appling, GA
    Posts
    275
    Maybe you can think of it as an opportunity to diversify not replace.
    Expand your riding options.

    Or, you could get a receiver hitch rack put on your car so that you do not have to lift the heavy bike so high.

    Cheaper than a new bike but more expensive than the "Hi-Tech Ski/Bike Removal System."

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •