Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 73

Thread: Surly Love

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Quote Originally Posted by KnottedYet View Post
    If you can lift your hybrid onto the rack, you'll be able to lift your LHT.

    My steel Surly is definitely lighter than my aluminum hybrid.
    Cool, that is good to know - I think my 7.6 is something like 24 pounds? I had just assumed that the steel bike would be heavier.

    Has anyone with an LHT tried the stock saddle? Though I must admit that the one I saw on the 56cm frame didn't look comfortable at all...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    I've only tried the stock saddle in a short test ride, so can't really comment.

    However I have read on oodles of Surly forum posts that they are pretty ordinary - its like they put a really basic saddle on with the knowledge that everyone is going to switch it out for their preferred saddle. Being built for long hauls, saddle comfort is paramount!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiddle View Post
    I've only tried the stock saddle in a short test ride, so can't really comment.

    However I have read on oodles of Surly forum posts that they are pretty ordinary - its like they put a really basic saddle on with the knowledge that everyone is going to switch it out for their preferred saddle. Being built for long hauls, saddle comfort is paramount!
    I never even tried the stock saddle - before it left the shop the first time it was sporting a nice Brooks B-17 saddle.

    Regarding the weight question I asked earlier in this thread some time ago - my LHT is noticeably lighter than my aluminum with carbon fork Trek 7.6 FX wsd bike. That was a surprise!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    Lighter than a trek FX ....YAY that's good news

    I've just ordered a Cross Check to replace my trek 7.3 FX, relieved to hear it will be a bit lighter. (Might start a new thread on this so I don't hijack this one)

    I talked DH out of buying a roof rack cause I didn't think I'd be able to lift the steel that high. Have you tried lifting it up onto the rack yet, or above your head?
    Last edited by Tiddle; 04-09-2010 at 04:32 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiddle View Post
    Lighter than a trek FX ....YAY that's good news

    I've just ordered a Cross Check to replace my trek 7.3 FX, relieved to hear it will be a bit lighter. (Might start a new thread on this so I don't hijack this one)

    I talked DH out of buying a roof rack cause I didn't think I'd be able to lift the steel that high. Have you tried lifting it up onto the rack yet, or above your head?
    If you look at my photo here of my "matching" car and bike, you will note that the trunk is quite high - at least for someone who is 5'3 in her stocking feet:

    http://forums.teamestrogen.com/showt...t=37052&page=3 and scroll down the page.

    My Trek 7.6 is quite the chore to get it up on the rack, and it isn't just due to the sloping top tube, the weight plays a role as well. My all-steel Surly Long Haul Trucker is quite noticeably lighter and takes much less effort to get it on my rack. That doesn't mean that the Trek weighs 30 pounds or anything, I think it is in the low-20 pound range.

    The LHT LOOKS smaller than the Trek, unless they are standing side by side - they are close to the same length and it is only the different geometry and the smaller wheels of the Surly that makes it look smaller. It really isn't though, outside of the 26-inch wheels. Eventually I will be adding fenders and racks to the LHT (the fenders will come in a couple of weeks) and it will be interesting to see what that does to the weight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Catrin View Post
    My Trek 7.6 is quite the chore to get it up on the rack, and it isn't just due to the sloping top tube, the weight plays a role as well.

    I ended up getting a bolt on top / cross bar to mount my Trek on the rack because of its sloping TT (and it saves the nice paint work too!)

    Thanks for the link. Your car and LHT were meant to be together!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiddle View Post
    I ended up getting a bolt on top / cross bar to mount my Trek on the rack because of its sloping TT (and it saves the nice paint work too!)

    Thanks for the link. Your car and LHT were meant to be together!
    I think so too!

    I got the cross-bar that clamps on my bike made by Saris and it actually doesn't make it much easier - I still have to struggle to get one side of the bike on the rack because of that TT - there just isn't much room between the cross-bar and the TT.

    What size is your Trek? I wonder if this is because mine is so small - it is the smallest 7.6 they make.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •