Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 56

Threaded View

  1. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    355
    I just don't ever understand how in the world these arguments come up in threads like this.

    The bike was HIT BY A CAR! I'm sorry, but steel, aluminum, and titanium don't have good car vs. bike track records either. And honestly, while people tout that "you can fix steel", "fixing" it after a catastrophic car vs. bike incident is going to cost nearly as much as a new frame if not more assuming a builder will even touch it. And I've heard people that did it anyway for a "favorite" bike say that it never rode anywhere near the same again so what's the point (and yes, the original builder fixed it)?

    I wouldn't trust steel that showed signs of damage after a car vs. bike incident any more than I'd trust carbon, and I doubt I'd truly trust it after it was "fixed" either ("was another weld stressed?" "did we miss a micro-fracture?" etc.), so that puts me in the same boat no matter the material in this instance.

    We can argue carbon vs. steel vs. aluminum vs. titanium till the cows come home and they ALL have their strengths and weaknesses. Really though, it doesn't matter the material, if you're hit by a car your bike is toast in almost all cases. It's ridiculous to use car vs. bike carnage as evidence against carbon. (and to be perfectly honest, when a professional does so it discredits them, in my eyes at least)
    Hey I never dissed carbon: I just said it can (and tends) to fail catastrophically. It needs to be treated with great care. Other materials can handle less delicate maintenance. Whatever happens to carbon fiber, be it car or DH overtightening the stem bolts, or whatever--when it fails, it fails completely. No warning. In the Tour De France, and many places elsewhere, you can find images (not on Versus) of professional riders on their professionally maintained full carbon rides, trying to avoid the inevitable when they are holding their handlebars/stems in the air completely disengaged from a failed carbon steerer tube.
    Steel doesn't do this, and yes, steel has its shortcomings in other ways. As does aluminum. You are absolutely correct: every material has its strengths and its shortcomings. I fully owned carbon fiber has its place in the cycling world. I wasn't telling the OP or anyone not to buy another carbon bike. I was talking about how it fails and the difficulty in dealing with it once it does. And, I still maintain that a bike coming apart in 4 places as it did in this instance, regardless of what impact it incurred (she slammed into the car, the car did not hit her bike) on a several thousand dollar bike, is unacceptable. But yeah, duh, I am biased.
    Last edited by lunacycles; 08-05-2009 at 06:38 PM.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •