Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Quote Originally Posted by GulfCoastAmy View Post
    Not sure about my HRM. I bought the Polar F6 (with the chest strap) specifically because of it's good reputation for accuracy. My heart rate gets really high when I cycle as compared to other activities I do. I assume it's because I'm a newbie and I'm pushing pretty hard. I'm sure as my body acclimates to the sport I will burn less. Or maybe it's just wrong? Dunno....
    When they talk about accuracy of a HRM, they're mostly talking about how accurately it reads and records your heart rate.

    Calories burned is another thing. Even the best estimators, that take into account age, sex and weight, are just estimators based on average people's VO2 max and average power output. (Polar is reputed to have one of the best estimators, though.)

    And I might be wrong about this, but I don't think your ability to burn calories at a given HR becomes more efficient as you become fitter - just the opposite - as someone pointed out, one component of calorie expenditure is your mechanical output, and obviously at any given HR, a professional cyclist can put out way more wattage than a recreational rider or casual racer.

    Or, to put it another way, if my HRM tells me I've burned as many calories in a day, as I know that TdF athletes eat during the race, I call BS.
    Last edited by OakLeaf; 07-30-2009 at 01:00 PM.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •