Car Show on Bike Path

[Deborajen]

Well, what we've been able to find out so far isn't very encouraging.

1. The City says they have no authority over the bike path in this situation. They're saying that the science museum (the building in the picture) is county property and that includes the bike path on its land.

2. The county says that since the museum is within the city limits, they can't do anything.

3. The science museum says they're sorry, they'll try to do better next time.

4. The charity says they're sorry, too (for the "inconvenience"), and they'll talk to the museum, etc., etc.

The local running club helped me get in touch with the City Park Dept contact, who responded (cc'd the running club) by saying this is a very serious issue - it does need to be addressed. I agree totally - but I haven't heard from the running club since.

The local cycling club has a city/county liaison (a former county commissioner) who offered a few suggestions on who to contact (mayor, city council, county commissioner, etc., which I was already working on). Then he e-mailed me back saying something like "I assume you're looking for assurance that this won't happen again because, at least so far, nobody in the world is able to undo events from the past" - ??

This is so frustrating! What good is a bike path if certain parts are an unexpected "free-for-all?" An event involving cars should not be able to be held on the bike path unless permits or signs or other safety measures to protect cyclists are LEGALLY required, and those laws should be enforced. I'm hoping the running club hasn't just dropped this, and I especially hope the cycling club takes this more seriously than that liaison fella. I just don't get this.

Maybe I'll write to the State, too.

OK - Vent over.

[TrekTheKaty]

Even though you may not hear about it, hopefully you have gotten someone's attention.

We ride a paved path around a lake here in St. Louis. They have frequent boat races, triathlons, senior olympics that may involve closing part of the path (inconvenient--it's a loop). They always put up signs along the path every intersection, the week before events. It's very considerate and allows us to make alternate plans. I wouldn't be surprised if this didn't develop from a problem way back.

Maybe a follow up letter to all concerned with suggestions for ways to avoid this in the future, such as signs a week before events that would affect the bike path?

[Zen]

Then he e-mailed me back saying something like "I assume you're looking for assurance that this won't happen again because, at least so far, nobody in the world is able to undo events from the past" - ??
.

head/desk

[Tuckervill]

head/desk

Well, as a person who puts on events on public property, and who listens to a lot of complaints and "constructive criticism" I think the above response indicates that perhaps she wasn't clear with her solution to the problem.

What is done, is done. Can't change that. Acknowledge that and move on. You don't know how many times people complain to get things off their chest and never offer a solution. It may seem obvious to us that the solution is to make sure the bike paths are kept clear, or if that can't be avoided, to provide adequate notice and safety measures. But if you don't state that outright to the official, you may just sound like a complainer, and you will be tuned out. Stop talking about what happened and try to focus on what *could* happen in the future if the same actions are taken by organizers again, and how that can be prevented.

Also, offer to help make it happen next time. Don't just say, "if you need my help, let me know." Say, "I can watch the community calendar and make sure I call the museum/organization ahead of time and suggest they take the proper steps that this doesn't happen."

Eventually, if you follow up with this level of detail, marking the trail will become standard protocol, and will be included in any contracts, I'll bet. But if we just never thought of it, we just never have. Nothing to be done about it now.

Karen

[Deborajen]

When I e-mailed the guy, yes, there was some complaining involved but I thought since he's a cyclist we'd be on the same side and he'd commiserate - and suggest who I could talk to. I thought it was pretty clear that I was, at this point, looking for the appropriate contact (actually, that was expressed in the first sentence of my e-mail) and wasn't just griping and wanting him to fix it.

However, I also told him who I'd contacted so far and he responded that I should also contact __________ - the exact people I'd just mentioned. I appreciate what you're saying about offering a clear solution, but I don't think this guy can read - among other problems.

[Mr. Bloom]

I think you did a good thing...change occurs one step at a time (and never as fast as we hope...)

[Deborajen]

Thanks. I hope so.

[Tuckervill]

When I e-mailed the guy, yes, there was some complaining involved but I thought since he's a cyclist we'd be on the same side and he'd commiserate - and suggest who I could talk to. I thought it was pretty clear that I was, at this point, looking for the appropriate contact (actually, that was expressed in the first sentence of my e-mail) and wasn't just griping and wanting him to fix it.

However, I also told him who I'd contacted so far and he responded that I should also contact __________ - the exact people I'd just mentioned. I appreciate what you're saying about offering a clear solution, but I don't think this guy can read - among other problems.

Yeah, you're probably right! lol.

Karen