Don't know, but - what I was taught when I was growing up is that 0-2= XS, 2-4=S, 4-6=M, 6-8=L, anything 10 and above=XL. So I guess 10-12 really is XL, or maybe I'm confused?
Back to your question though - I guess the main factor is marketing, since the companies' purpose is to actually sell their clothes. So what they do is to cater to the majority of cyclists. And cyclists tend to be of slim athletic build.
Now if you turn on th TV and watch a stage of a grand tour - well, most cyclists are in the average BMI range or below average. Likewise, if you ride around in your area and meet team members or club members - probably overweight cyclists will be a small minority.
So if a company wants to make good sale #s, they need to sell a lot of shorts and jerseys (especially cute ones as you say) - and so they need to make sure that their marketing target is the majority of cyclists which is low-to-average weight.
Now, if you say that this leaves out whoever does not meet the marketing/publicity standards and you don't like it - yes, I hear you. There are, as you said, some companies that develop within a market niche and provide good products to everyone regardless of size - but I would guess that most companies would try to cater to a larger # of cyclists, and that does not include the subpopulation of overweight/plus sizes.
One solution is semi-custom, a couple of my cycling buddies on the heavy side have ordered a lot of custom and semi-custom items to have nicer jerseys and kits. And, as Trek said, here on TE they have some products for plus sizes. But that's about all I can suggest, don't know much about it
Not sure if I was able to answer in a way that makes sense - I'm not a marketing expert so really I don't know. Maybe Susan here on TE can help with a more detailed insight - Susanilluminate all of us please?




Seriously, a size 10-12 is EXTRA LARGE??? Really??

illuminate all of us please?
Reply With Quote