what would you do?

**Grog** · 05-09-2009, 11:56 AM

I would say yes without an afterthought.

**papaver** · 05-09-2009, 12:01 PM

it's what we call a 'low impact home'. With lot's of environmental friendly features (like special thermal insulation, a rainwater collector, special heating system, solar panels...).

And the fact that a architectural house doesn't has to be that expensive...

**shootingstar** · 05-09-2009, 12:07 PM

Originally Posted by papaver

it's what we call a 'low impact home'. With lot's of environmental friendly features (like special thermal insulation, a rainwater collector, special heating system, solar panels...).

And the fact that a architectural house doesn't has to be that expensive...

Would agree here..most definitely. It's a good thing that in some parts of North America there has been stronger movement on sustainable housing ...well for certain new neighbourhoods.

Got ideas for a tree or shrubs? (I'm sure our landscape architects in TE could give you tons of ideas.) Enjoy your comfy home!

**papaver** · 05-09-2009, 12:16 PM

the trees in the decking are juneberries. I love those trees.

**BleeckerSt_Girl** · 05-09-2009, 12:32 PM

I'd do it... if they paid decently!

**skinimini** · 05-10-2009, 02:11 PM

I'd do it, and in fact, I've done it--for a local home style magazine. Ours was just for an interior renovation. It was a great experience, although I would say it was a little unnerving to see your story in print. We were at home the entire time and the photographer didn't move anything. The architect did get a lot of publicity. Surprisingly, the magazine did a recap just last summer of "favorite re-dos". I didn't know about that one until the magazine hit the shelves.

Your house is so incredibly cool! I really like your contemporary, eco-friendly design.

**salsabike** · 05-09-2009, 02:00 PM

Originally Posted by PamNY

Depends on you and your personality. Some people love attention and publicity; others don't. Only you can decide.

Pam

Originally Posted by papaver

Well it's about the house, not about me.

(fortunately

). It's kinda difficult, because i really think our architect can use the publicity. But on the other hand...

I think Pam just meant: do what you are personally comfortable with...

**Zen** · 05-09-2009, 03:13 PM

If it were me, I'd do it under the condition that I and the house location remained anonymous. The architect would still get some press.

**Miranda** · 05-09-2009, 04:57 PM

I'm with Zen on not publishing the local. Though if peeps really wanted to find it bad enough they would. It's sad... but unfortunately there are a lot of crazies in the world.

I think I am in the love camp for your house. I was just thinking about mine the other day. I've come to the point in life I don't need all the "stuff" I had before. I hate the decor, etc. Give me open, clean, simple. It can translate to... spectacular.

I say if you are ok with it, go for it!

**Tuckervill** · 05-09-2009, 06:39 PM

I'd do it, too. I'd cleanse my house of all the things like family pictures that could identify me. But I'd let them do any pictures they want.

Karen

**Skierchickie** · 05-10-2009, 09:07 AM

Very cool, Papaver! The whole concept!

Apparently, I wouldn't do it. I know because the place we got our cabinets and countertops from asked afterward if they could come in and take some shots for a commercial they were putting together. I was very flattered (I designed it myself), and very excited at first, but then started feeling uncomfortable. I ended up declining. Probably due to my upbringing, and the feeling that I was bragging somehow. Now the entire house is a perpetual mess

, so nobody would ever ask that again!

**papaver** · 05-10-2009, 10:30 AM

Well, we talked about it and we are going to say yes for the exterior shots but we will not go for the interior shots. It's a bit too intimate.

The interiorshots are really about my interior design (i'm pretty good at it). I sometimes use my house as a setting for my work (advertising) and then we take pics of a detail of my interior and not a whole room. I have no problems with a pic of my wallpaper or something like that, but I don't want everybody to see my library where I relax...

Do i make sense?

**msincredible** · 05-11-2009, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by papaver

Well, we talked about it and we are going to say yes for the exterior shots but we will not go for the interior shots. It's a bit too intimate.

The interiorshots are really about my interior design (i'm pretty good at it). I sometimes use my house as a setting for my work (advertising) and then we take pics of a detail of my interior and not a whole room. I have no problems with a pic of my wallpaper or something like that, but I don't want everybody to see my library where I relax...

Do i make sense?

Sounds like a good decision!

**tulip** · 05-10-2009, 03:30 PM

My SO's house has been in a magazine. The interior was the focus, since it was a total renovation. It's very modern (originally built in the 1960s). One thing that the magazine wanted to know but that he did not divulge was the cost of renovation/construction. That was off limits.

I think you should do it. Since you have multiple requests, choose carefully. Your architect would probably have the best ideas of which requests are worth responding to.

by the way, your house looks wonderful!

Thread: what would you do?

Thread Tools

Display

Hybrid View

Posting Permissions