Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841

    To disable ads, please log-in.

    My british relatives that tell me how many stones they weigh confuse me.

    Why would you want to multiply by 14 to get how many lbs?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    I don't get how my Garmins report position as "X degrees, Y.YYY minutes."

    Why not either "degrees, minutes, seconds" or "X.XXXX degrees"?
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,372
    Quote Originally Posted by Catriona View Post
    My british relatives that tell me how many stones they weigh confuse me.

    Why would you want to multiply by 14 to get how many lbs?
    well, I know why you'd want to divide by 14 to get stones. I like my weight in stones just fine.
    My photoblog
    http://dragons-fly-peacefully.blogspot.com/
    Bacchetta Giro (recumbent commuter)
    Bacchetta Corsa (recumbent "fast" bike)
    Greespeed X3 (recumbent "just for fun" trike)
    Strada Velomobile
    I will never buy another bike!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,023
    I'm an EE, and an RF one at that, so I live in two worlds. At work, everything is not only in metric, but it's tiny, tiny metric (pico, nano, etc) or super large metric (giga, tera, etc). At home, I deal with predominantly Imperial (being a stubborn American).

    In my world, a meter is a VERY real measurement.

    Add to this my obsession with my weight - and I learned quickly to convert food scale weight into cups, tablespoons, etc. Then throw in the need to scale down most 'herd' recipes for our goats (we only have two)...so I need to be able to scale down from gallons and cups into tablespoons and teaspoons without error...and then back into ml and cc for the administering of the dosage.

    Honestly, onlineconversion.com is my friend.
    My new non-farm blog: Finding Freedom

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    46
    My brain does the same thing, and I always measured in metric in school! But I actually have no idea of my weight in kgs or height in cms, as most of my life I've heard those things in lbs and feet/inches, despite being in Canada. I also don't know my cooking measurements in ml (might be because everything I use from cook books is in tsp tbsp cups).

    Google has a great function for this. Just open a google search window, type in the amount you have, and it comes up with the equivalent in the most likely form. Ex. if I typed in "84 inches" it gives me an "84 inches = 2.1336 meters". Click the more about calculator and it shows you how to do other conversion options too.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Western Canada-prairies, mountain & ocean
    Posts
    6,984
    Quote Originally Posted by Catriona View Post
    My british relatives that tell me how many stones they weigh confuse me.

    Why would you want to multiply by 14 to get how many lbs?
    So I understand there was previous older stone measurement, where 1 stone used to be 16 lbs.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Oh, well I'd much prefer to multiply by 16.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Toltec, Arkansaw
    Posts
    512
    Quote Originally Posted by OakLeaf View Post
    I don't get how my Garmins report position as "X degrees, Y.YYY minutes."

    Why not either "degrees, minutes, seconds" or "X.XXXX degrees"?
    That's why I leave my "Varmint" set to UTM grids. At least then it measures in meters, which are a constant length, rather than a degree (which gets bigger as you get closer to the equator).

    When I lived in Germany several years ago, I got used to doing everything in meters, liters, and kilograms, but it was still nice to be able to stroll into the little local grocery store and ask for "ein halb Pfunde" of something, and the lady behind the counter still knew just what I was talking about. ;-)

    Tom

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Toltec, Arkansaw
    Posts
    512
    Quote Originally Posted by shootingstar View Post
    So I understand there was previous older stone measurement, where 1 stone used to be 16 lbs.
    I think that was up in the north end of the Old Country, where the rocks were a lot bigger... ;-)

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Western Canada-prairies, mountain & ocean
    Posts
    6,984
    Quote Originally Posted by PscyclePath View Post
    When I lived in Germany several years ago, I got used to doing everything in meters, liters, and kilograms, but it was still nice to be able to stroll into the little local grocery store and ask for "ein halb Pfunde" of something, and the lady behind the counter still knew just what I was talking about. ;-)
    funde = 500 grams. A unique German measure which is not quite the imperial lb. Supposedly an older German measure.

    So you asked for 250 grams. Must have been chocolates or smoked salmon you asked for.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Toltec, Arkansaw
    Posts
    512
    Quote Originally Posted by shootingstar View Post
    funde = 500 grams. A unique German measure which is not quite the imperial lb. Supposedly an older German measure.

    So you asked for 250 grams. Must have been chocolates or smoked salmon you asked for.
    Half a kilo, and since a kilo is roughly 2.24 pounds, it's close enough for me, at least ;-)

    And it was cold cuts, usually... or Wurst. Chocolates, I usually got the Lindt bars down at the train station. or the little chocolate covered jellies, typically bananas, oranges, or lemons. "twas good stuff, back then.

    Tom

  12. #27
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    564
    Another science nerd here. I find that my brain handles kilograms and celcius just fine at work. The instant I walk out the door, it flips back to lbs and F.

    The boyfriend is Canadian; he flips between km and miles like it's nothing, whereas I have difficulty with kilometers father than I can bike. When he told me something was 300k away, I squinted for a second and admitted "ok, one more time in real numbers...?"

    I still think of everything pressure in PSI, though. 3 bar doesn't sound like a lot, but eeeesh.

    -- gnat!

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    5,316

    quart

    The Quinoa recipe I just cooked made me chuckle & wonder...I thought it was funny, odd & strange...

    Why is it that an American recipe would state you require a quart of liquid & then a cup of a non liquid item? Would it not make sense to use one measurement(ie: a cup) for both liquid & non liquid materials??



    Interesting....

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Quote Originally Posted by crazycanuck View Post
    The Quinoa recipe I just cooked made me chuckle & wonder...I thought it was funny, odd & strange...

    Why is it that an American recipe would state you require a quart of liquid & then a cup of a non liquid item? Would it not make sense to use one measurement(ie: a cup) for both liquid & non liquid materials??



    Interesting....
    Those aren't different systems, just different increments in the same system of volume measurement - a quart is four cups, a pint is two cups, a gallon is four quarts, a tablespoon is three teaspoons, four tablespoons is 1/4 cup.

    Where it DOES get confusing is in "ounces," which is both a unit of weight (1/16 pound) and of volume (1/8 cup or two tablespoons). So you have to specify "fluid ounces" or "ounces avoirdupois."
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,556
    The one I can't understand is that several years ago the scientific journals I publish in insisted that we no long use millibars as a unit of atmospheric pressure, but hectopascals (ie. 100 pascals), which are exactly the same thing. Now you find people who read "850 hPa" as "850 millibars", as if millibars just has a new abbreviation. Very odd that hecto-anything is considered a standard unit.

    I can generally deal with both English and metric units, but I absolutely cannot abide the Rankin scale.
    Oil is good, grease is better.

    2007 Peter Mooney w/S&S couplers/Terry Butterfly
    1993 Bridgestone MB-3/Avocet O2 Air 40W
    1980 Columbus Frame with 1970 Campy parts
    1954 Raleigh 3-speed/Brooks B72

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •