Wind, rider weight, & spokes

[Veronica]

At 150 pounds, riding along the spine of a ridge, I definitely felt the wind pushing me around a bit when my wheels had bladed spokes. I guess a lot depends on how much wind and where you are because that was the only time I really felt the effects of a crosswind.

Veronica

[Bluetree]

I fit that criteria. I'm about 110 lbs and my bike weighs 14.3-14.8 depending on the choice of wheelset.

Personally, I love the bladed spokes. My favorite all-around wheelsets are the Fulcrum Racing Zeros/Ones and I've never had problems with wind that I wouldn't have with non-bladed spokes. They are also some of my favorite climbing wheels because they handle descents so well. As others have said, wind becomes more of an issue with deeper rims or, in my case, ultra light wheelsets that run 1000-1200g (like the Reynolds KOM). For some reason, my tires never felt stuck to the road when they got to a certain lightness and made me feel squirrely in the wind.

That said, I'd have to caution you if aero-bladed wheels will be your only set. The surfaces scratch easily and can get grungy looking if on bad roads, and require more clean-up care to prevent corrosion, especially near coastal areas. On top of that, if one of my Fulcrum spokes gets damaged, it costs $40 per spoke to get it replaced. Something to think about.

[Miranda]

That said, I'd have to caution you if aero-bladed wheels will be your only set. The surfaces scratch easily and can get grungy looking if on bad roads, and require more clean-up care to prevent corrosion, especially near coastal areas. On top of that, if one of my Fulcrum spokes gets damaged, it costs $40 per spoke to get it replaced. Something to think about.

Thx, that's a good consideration. Yes, they will be my only set to start ($ going into overall bike). My rual roads are a lot of chip and seal. Sometimes they put that nasty gravel over-lay. Those I try to avoid when I know about it. So, no... my pavement is not a smooth road dedicated bike lane (*dreams of in bike heaven*).

[Bluetree]

I wish my camera was working so I can show what gravel can do. I have an old pair of Fulcrum 3s, which I use in the rain or just after a rain when there is a lot of debris in the road. (They have the same aero blades as my nicer wheels, but they are much cheaper version and weigh a ton.) The surfaces of the blades are chipped and scuffed, and they look a bit worse for wear. That is all cosmetic, however, as the wheels themselves are bomb-proof. I would never put on my nice wheels if I thought the roads were yucky, I'm too much of a prima donna about my gear.

And no, the noise is negligible. Deep dish rims and disk wheels are much noisier (although personally, I love the sound... Whoosh! Whoosh!)

[indysteel]

I would add that I live in central Indiana. Minus the short period where the corn is high, wind is an issue on a lot of our rides, so for me, cutting down on the effect of crosswinds makes an issue. Unfortunately, I have not been able to compare apples to apples when it comes to my different wheels sets. The set of wheels I have with bladed spokes are a lot heavier and not nearly as nice as my handbuilts. It could be that if I had a lightweight set of wheels built with bladed spokes, I'd like them just as well in the wind.

[spokewench]

I'm 125 pounds 5'4". I used to ride regular round spoked old style wheels on a Bridgestone RB-1 steel bike (Heavy) and more slack geometry. It was great in the wind, downhill, etc., but sucked going uphill.

I finally bit the bullet a couple of years ago and bought a Giant Carbon fiber bike (really light, faster geometry) with bladed spokes and larger rim size. And, I live in Flagstaff Arizona. We are notorious for HIGH, High Winds in the spring and most of the year for that matter!

It took me a bit to get used to this bike - it moves fast when it gets hit by crosswinds; and sometimes is a bit scary even to me and I've been riding for years. I'm finally used to it and compensate for the wind movement as best as possible, but I know I'm going to dance around a bit when it is windy!

spoke

[aicabsolut]

No, a deeper rim is NOT more stable (in a crosswind) in terms of the amount of lateral push you'll feel. However, there are a lot of factors built into your decision.

1) Weight. You are a light rider (for comparison, I'm 5'7" and around 125lbs), and you are about to shed even more weight with your bike. A lot of moderately deep rims are still pretty light, because they tend to be more race-type wheels. Light weight overall means you can get pushed around a fair bit. A light and deep wheelset, particularly a light and deep front wheel will feel the most unstable.

2) Aerodynamics. For some, the added aerodynamic benefit of a deep rim outweighs increased difficulty in handling during strong crosswinds. So for your wide open flat road riding, a deep rim is nice, because when you get those puppies up to speed, it is a lot easier to maintain that speed. (Fewer watts needed, meaning less rider fatigue). It won't necessarily make you faster, but you can be fast for longer. Add some light weight to that aerodynamics, and you can also spin up to speed faster.

3) Surface area and handling. This factor goes with #1 but focusing more on depth and bladed spokes rather than weight. Bladed spokes and/or a deeper rim will feel different than a shallow rim (rounded or square-ish) and rounded spokes, but more surface area doesn't necessarily mean worse handling. The shallow rim / round spoke wheel can feel a lot more JERKY in a crosswind (like the wind grabs you and flings you around), while bladed spokes and/or a deep rim with feel like you're getting a consistent sideways push. For the most part, I prefer the feel of the latter. It takes some getting used to, but I generally feel like it's easier to control.

There's one exception to that last statement, and that's when you've gone a little too light and a little too deep with the front wheel for your (including bike) weight and the strength of the crosswind. That can lead to a very unnerving front end shimmy (especially at high speeds, like when descending--and you will descend faster because you're more aero) going along with the otherwise not so scary lateral push.

For a lightweight rider, I would not recommend having deep wheels as your only wheelset. I don't see a problem with having bladed spokes by themselves, however, but that might depend on the individual wheel. For example, some shallower wheels might handle poorly in crosswinds because of overall design, and bladed spokes don't help (I'm thinking higher end Ksyriums here). Some of that may be that not all bladed spokes are created equal. Some are round at the nipple and taper into a blade and then back to round. My wheels, on the other hand, only have flat spokes exposed. They are laced continuously through the hub (10 spokes look like 20), and the ends are hidden (attach to the clincher rim) by a deep carbon fairing. So, the wind behaves consistently over the whole length of the spoke versus the ones that have some not so bladed parts exposed.

There are plenty of days where I will not take my deep wheels outside. This week, the wind picked up a lot after I was already out, and so I had to be extra cautious on descents. I haven't figured out if it's better to weight the front end more with my body or to lighten up on it and keep my weight back like I normally would in those conditions.

For some reason, my rear Shimano training wheel doesn't sit centered on my new bike (it's really close to one chainstay), and I'm not liking having to take out the old bike when it's windy just because of the wheel choice. So, one of these days, I'll build up a light, shallow climbing wheelset for the new bike and use it also on very windy days. But I digress...

If you do need to have your "good" wheelset be your primary wheelset, and an aerodynamic advantage is important to you, then I recommend going deeper in the rim profile in the rear than the front. For example, Zipp used to make a "343" wheelset, but you can mix and match that brand and some others that make basically the same wheel in different depths. The 343 was a 303 front and 404 rear. You get some of the good aerodynamics of the 404, but while the 303 front wheel is even lighter, it is a much shallower and easier to control. The tradeoff is losing the full aero benefit of a 404 set.

[Miranda]

OK... thx for that feedback thus far. I have not really geeked out all the aspects of the wheels in making the decision. Thus, I'm still in the gathering info/education mode. But, talk to a bit more about the rim depth issue if anyone pops back on that mentioned it, or knows. (Later today, I will ask Mr. Google and Sheldon too... and my lbs of course that's pending the sale)

Off the top of my head, I'm guessing: deeper rims = more stability?

That is also a good point about where you are riding. My routes are in the rual county areas. Think MidWest open farm fields... corn, beans, and wheat (tall corn near harvest time does break some wind). I try to pick routes that are less car traveled. Sometimes I have to travel the busy ones to get to a dead quite road though. On the rual roads, the average speed limit for cars is 45-55mph (not counting road rage bike hating speed demons). The shoulder is not rideable to get off on the road bike tires (loose gravel/field dirt run off etc.). Basically, I just try to hold my line as straight at possible and pray as the cars pass. Thus, why I'm geeking out my wheels a bit more.

I know lots of peeps ride the bladed spokes. Just like some of you smaller ladies have posted do it. Sounds like the rim is the bigger factor.

EDIT ADD: Also, I have heard that the blades are noisey? Any ops?