Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Between the Blue Ridge and the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    5,203
    If you live near corn-producing areas, then that might make sustainable sense, although I question burning a food source. But corn is renewable compared to trees an coal, as long as you don't cut down forests to grow the corn. The town next to my old town had a corn silo for all the people who had corn stoves. This was right outside of Washington, DC, not out in Iowa! Smelled like popcorn in the winter.

    I have a stove that burns coal and wood. Next winter I will burn both if I can find a source for high-quality anthracite coal. Such coal comes from Pennsylvania, as I understand it. While not right down the street, it does get delivered by train. Anthracite burns very slowly and very hot, and you don't need much in a small stove. Renewable it is not, however.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Quote Originally Posted by tulip View Post
    as long as you don't cut down forests to grow the corn.
    Or drain gas wells, which is how most corn is grown in the US (with copious amounts of nitrogen fertilizer = anhydrous ammonia).
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    foothills of the Ozarks aka Tornado Alley
    Posts
    4,193
    I'm beginning to think most food sources are unsafe. Genetically engineered corn, chicken on antibiotics, cows on steroids, fish filled with mercury, the list goes on. Is chocolate still safe?

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •