Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 46

Thread: Downhill Skiing

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Quote Originally Posted by ttaylor508 View Post
    One more Lotta Luv skier here. I love them, although I wish I would have went for one size down. I feel they are a bit too long for me. That's the bummer about ski's, once you have tried them, you can't take them back to adjust size.
    K2's because of how they measure them tend to be bigger/longer skis for their size than the other ski manufacturers... What K2 calls a 160 is longer than what other ski manufacturers call a 160.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Looking at all the love there that's sleeping
    Posts
    4,171
    Really?? You know...I've never actually measured mine. And FWIW, I always felt mine were too short. TTaylor...wanna trade?
    2007 Seven ID8 - Bontrager InForm
    2003 Klein Palomino - Terry Firefly (?)
    2010 Seven Cafe Racer - Bontrager InForm
    2008 Cervelo P2C - Adamo Prologue Saddle

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    315
    Quote Originally Posted by 7rider View Post
    Really?? You know...I've never actually measured mine. And FWIW, I always felt mine were too short. TTaylor...wanna trade?
    Mine are 153's (I think), I should be on a 149! I was actually thinking about trying to sell mine on Craigslist and get the right size. I will probably have to tough it out this year until I get a job.

    Totally drifting from the topic, but does anyone else get vertigo when skiing in the fog? There was really dense fog on Friday and after about 5 runs, I was completely sick to my stomach like I had just ridden a carnival ride.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Quote Originally Posted by ttaylor508 View Post
    Mine are 153's (I think), I should be on a 149! I was actually thinking about trying to sell mine on Craigslist and get the right size. I will probably have to tough it out this year until I get a job.

    Totally drifting from the topic, but does anyone else get vertigo when skiing in the fog? There was really dense fog on Friday and after about 5 runs, I was completely sick to my stomach like I had just ridden a carnival ride.
    I can't say I've gotten sick to my stomach, but I've gotten pretty weirded out and disoriented.

    A friend & I were skiing at snowbird a few weeks ago... We decided we wanted to go through the tunnel to the other side of the mountain to see what it looked like... we did that, but at that time a thick fog had set in. I'd never skied the front or back side of that mountain, and she hadn't skied it in years... So we knew there was an easy green to get down and a bunch of blacks... and there were a bunch of "danger cliff signs"... Either of us would have been game to ski the blacks if we knew the territory or could see... So we decided to be cautious and take the green down... We found our way down it, but it's a bit disorienting to suddenly drop down a 2-3 feet drop that you couldn't see. We could see no detail in the snow, and could barely see each other.

    We got back up on the lift, but then had to take the cat track over to the front side of the mountain to get out of that... Very icy cat track with a steep drop off down the side - and we couldn't see the sides or the switchbacks till we were right on them, it was blowing snow or ice and caking our goggles instantly... so pretty much had to take off our goggles and just squint against the ice that was blowing in. We pretty much snowplowed our way down (I haven't snowplowed in years).. then got to the open bowl at the bottom and did the..... Okay, we can't see a thing, and we know there's 1 blue to get down here, and a bunch of blacks... heck if we know which way to ski to get to the blue, because the signs are all at the bottom and neither of us had been down the front. And we both knew there were sections with cliffs and it is possible to cliff out at snowbird. And the bowl was pretty carved up in moguls, and while I'm reasonable with moguls I GOTTA BE ABLE TO SEE THEM... hitting mogus you don't see, sucks.

    Anyways, eventually we happened upon some guys that knew the terrain, who guided us the rest of the way down. Then we went and got into the hot tub, because neither of us had any desire to go back up there and try to find our way back down again.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sierra Foothills, CA
    Posts
    800
    Quote Originally Posted by Catriona View Post
    K2's because of how they measure them tend to be bigger/longer skis for their size than the other ski manufacturers... What K2 calls a 160 is longer than what other ski manufacturers call a 160.
    I bought 163's and I'm 5'6"/155 lbs. so I'm hoping I made the right decision. I've been skiing on Tru Luv 153's for the last three seasons and they've been feeling too short...like there wasn't enough length in the tail to carve good turns. I love my Tru Luv's but I've been feeling like they're not challenging me anymore. On yesterday's maiden voyage with the Lotta Luvs, I could definiltey feel the extra length of the 163's but they felt good. They may be a tad long but I think I'll adjust.

    I think my old old skis from the 90's were 185's...it seems so weird to be thinking 163's are long!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Quote Originally Posted by RolliePollie View Post
    I bought 163's and I'm 5'6"/155 lbs. so I'm hoping I made the right decision. I've been skiing on Tru Luv 153's for the last three seasons and they've been feeling too short...like there wasn't enough length in the tail to carve good turns. I love my Tru Luv's but I've been feeling like they're not challenging me anymore. On yesterday's maiden voyage with the Lotta Luvs, I could definiltey feel the extra length of the 163's but they felt good. They may be a tad long but I think I'll adjust.

    I think my old old skis from the 90's were 185's...it seems so weird to be thinking 163's are long!
    I think you'll be fine... I'm 5'1 and I have 160's in the phat luvs and just bought 160's in the lotta luvs. I'm probably skiing longer than I should be, but I'm used to it and I manage fine.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Looking at all the love there that's sleeping
    Posts
    4,171
    I have the 153's and I'm 5'8" and...well, a bit heavier than you.
    I wanted the 163's (or a comparable size, whatever they had when I got them), but all they had left were the 153's and I was assured they would be fine. Yeah, they're okay, but like you, I think I would like to have a bit more material under me. My last skis (more like red and black noodles, they were so floppy) were 170's. Before that, I had 177's, so my skis keep getting shorter!
    FWIW, I just ran a tape measure down the base of my DH's Atomic's. His advertised 164's are indeed 164 cm. My K2's, when I measure the same way as DH's skis, are 154...not 153.
    2007 Seven ID8 - Bontrager InForm
    2003 Klein Palomino - Terry Firefly (?)
    2010 Seven Cafe Racer - Bontrager InForm
    2008 Cervelo P2C - Adamo Prologue Saddle

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Utah, Gateway to Nevada, not to be confused with Idaho
    Posts
    1,872
    Still fun....check!

    I demoed the Lotta Luvs but, alas, they weren't quite fat enough for what I wanted them to do. That said, I might try to pick up a used demo pair or one of the Burnin' Luv for groomer skiing (which I don't really do that often...if I have to ski the groomers, then I'd rather be Nordic skiing, snob that I am...but I do have friends that only ski the groomers and, well, I might as well make it more fun). The Lottas turn fast and were pretty fun in the bumps, I thought. The Burnin' Luvs got rave reviews for an on-piste ski. Anybody tried them?

    Don't worry solo, I'll still tele a bit. Making big tele turns in powder on the steeps is such a blast...

    FWIW, I am 5'2" and I have 156 Tough Luvs and am very happy that I didn't go shorter. My tele skis are 163, but they aren't as fat.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Credit to Ski Nurse from the sac forum/ski diva/peaceloveski.com/goingprepared.com


    Quote Originally Posted by Ski Nurse
    Luv advice...
    Wednesday, January 09 2008, 01:52 PM
    by SkiNurse (2453)

    I know..too little too late. But this can be for the next time they are up.

    First of all, K2s skis RUN BIG. A 160 in women's K2s is a 167 in female Rossingnal (for example). K2 and I think, Voikl, measure the skiable area NOT tip to tip. So, take that into consideration.

    I am 5'2", #120. I ski the Burnin' Luvs 160cm and the Lotta Luvs 153 (yea, they come in 153s) Since the Lotta Luvs are close to the top of the totem pole for aggressiveness, is why I went one size smaller. I wanted to ski the ski, not the ski ski me! Remember the sizing difference in K2s from other skis. I'm a very assertive skier, not necesarily an aggresive skier. I can ski all mountain, but prefer natural terrain and steep powder bowls. But, the type of ski preference also goes with if you are a Rockies skier vs a West coast skier vs an East coast skier.

    And, I love my Luvs! Fantastic skis. But, I'm a K2 girl.

    Check out www.theskidiva.com for many different types of ski reviews.

    Maybe I shouldn't have gotten the 160's in the Lotta Luvs, if Ski Nurse was using 153's... I skied with her last year in Colorado and she's a hella better skier than I am.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    Btw, I've gotten the lotta luvs & skied on them about 4 times now... and absolutely love them. They allow me to ski far more aggressively than my previous ones - and just seem to be a better fit & balance for me than my old skis.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •