Can't Decide!

[Aquila]

I see this as two questions, I guess, but maybe I'm reading wrong.

The first question is about which bike. I think you have to ride different bikes around until one really speaks to you. Test several, re-ride. Take the bikes out on the trail for a couple miles.

I know that seems long and drawn out, but the right bike makes riding a joy, and the wrong one makes it torture, so it's worth finding the right one.

The second question was about bike shops. I was able to narrow my choice down to one shop fairly quickly (of the three I went to in my community) because only one really talked to me about what I wanted from a bike and had me try out different ones, making adjustments, explaining things, and so forth. One of the others had WAY more bikes in the shop, but either they weren't interested or they didn't have bikes that could fit me (they had lots of men's bikes, and mountain/commuter bikes, but only one women's road bike).

Right now, it sounds like Bike shop #2 has the bike that fit you best and they took time to have you try a bike that fit well. But maybe I read wrong.

Good luck!

[Kelly728]

Right now, it sounds like Bike shop #2 has the bike that fit you best and they took time to have you try a bike that fit well. But maybe I read wrong.

Good luck!

I think I may have had 3 questions (my head is spinning so I really am making no sense right now). Which bike, which shop, and is a 52cm too big for someone so short. Even though it feels "right" I don't think I'm quite sure what right means!

The Trek feels like it may be speaking to me but the $200 difference is screaming if that make sense. I know I'll regret it if I don't get the one I want, I just have to mull over it!

I would say both took about the same about of time to fit me. LBS #1 started me on the 52 and put me down the the 50 because I looked like I was reaching. They moved that seat way up there in the adjustments! LBS #2 started me on the 50 and moved me up to the 52 since my knees were too bent on the smaller bike. Both were equal in how much time they took to explain everything. I guess I'm worried about sounding like a "know-it-all" when LBS #1 feels I should be on the smaller bike.

I'm just nervous about ending up on the wrong thing! (I swear I'm not usually this anxious or indecisive!)

[Tri Girl]

It can be so stressful when shopping for a new bike. Just go with your gut on this one. If you like the 2nd shop better and feel like they're leading you the right direction and you like the mechanics/salespeople/owner then go for it. When you buy a bike, you are buying a relationship with the shop. $200 won't matter if you don't feel comfortable/happy with your shop IMO.
I guess a 52 wouldn't be outrageous for a 5'3" person, but yowza! I have short legs and a short torso and my 48 fits me perfectly (but it's not WSD, so that might make a diff). I've ridden a 47 and have a 49 touring bike that's a bit big. I only wish I had the length to ride a 52- it would've made buying a bike allow me so many more choices.

Good luck with your decision, and make sure you let us know what you wind up choosing.

[salsabike]

I am 5' 4 1/2" and ride a 50.

Can you find a bike fitter to talk with before you buy anything?? E.g., we have PTs in this area who are cyclists and bike fitters. They have no vested interest in selling you a particular bike, and could give you good objective info on your particular fit needs. I think that would help a lot.

[ilima]

I am 5' 4 1/2" and ride a 50.

Same height and I ride a 49cm. Used to have a 52, which was rideable but too big.

[Kelly728]

Gosh why couldn't this be as easy as finding shoes. Just playing around a REI before I headed over the to bike shop, all the shoes on display just happened to be a 40. I figured hey, why not.. Tossed on the Sidi Zetas and man, those things were made for my foot!

Sigh.

I'm going to get back to LBS #1 hopefully Tuesday and go on about what happened at LBS #2. Hopefully I can get a different sales person so I have more than one opinion. Thinking about it, I'm sure that the only reason I felt more comfortable on the larger bike is because I felt more upright. I'm not used to a road bike so not used to the position at all. At one point at LBS #2 I mentioned that I felt like I was reaching but of course Mr. Bike Dude assured me I wasn't (which I believed him because I don't know!). *Breathing*

[Eden]

Thinking about it, I'm sure that the only reason I felt more comfortable on the larger bike is because I felt more upright. I'm not used to a road bike so not used to the position at all. At one point at LBS #2 I mentioned that I felt like I was reaching but of course Mr. Bike Dude assured me I wasn't (which I believed him because I don't know!). *Breathing*

This is not uncommon - it does take some time to get used to (and get flexible!) a road cycling position. If you are stretched out you won't be able to have a comfortable bend in your elbows when your hands are on the hoods of the bike. If you're arms are straight or elbows locked then the bike is too big. If you cannot stand and pedal without feeling like you are going to fall forward the bike is likely too large also.

I'd be skeptical of most bike dudes.... shops that really know how to fit are not so common. They tried to talk me into a 48cm the last time I bought a bike (I'm 5'0" long legs [28.5" inseam] short torso/arms). I knew I needed a 44.... and even that is a bit long for me. A 48 would have been really big.

[Cyclesome]

I'm 5' 5 1/2 " with a 30 inch inseam and ride a 51cm Specialized Ruby Pro. I feel like I am part of the bike when I ride it. Size is important. Take your time before making any decisions.

[vinbek]

I am 5'2 or sometimes 5'3" on a good day and I started on a used 52 cannondale. I always felt like I was riding on top of the bike and not a part of it. I have very long arms. I acutually went to a 48 and put a longer stem on it. It feels so much better. There are so many things to take into account when buying a bike and especially if you haven't been riding a bike alot lately. You don't know what you like until you've had some time on the road. I would think it through and go with your gut instinct. Good luck! Bekki

[OakLeaf]

What was it about the 52 cm bike that felt so much better to you? Can they let you try it with the stem they're thinking about?

I'm 5'3" and I'm riding a 50 cm Cannondale WSD bike that's possibly marginally too big for me. But it all depends on your body proportions. Every manufacturer has their own sizing conventions too now, with the sloping top tubes - it's not like the old days when it was either center-to-center or center-to-top and the frame size was the actual measurement of the seat tube. With a horizontal top tube, my old custom frame was 47 cm c-to-c.

When you say your "knees were too bent" on the 50 cm bike, do you just mean seat height, or something else? Was the saddle raised as high as the seatpost would go, and you still couldn't straighten your legs on the pedal stroke?

[Kelly728]

I guess a 52 wouldn't be outrageous for a 5'3" person, but yowza! I have short legs and a short torso and my 48 fits me perfectly (but it's not WSD, so that might make a diff). I've ridden a 47 and have a 49 touring bike that's a bit big. I only wish I had the length to ride a 52- it would've made buying a bike allow me so many more choices.

I have over a 31" inseam so basically no torso.

Thanks salsa, I'll look around and see what I can find. I'd rather not lay out any more money (aka after this bike I won't have any money!) but this is getting difficult.

Oak- The seat tube on the 50cm was raised to the point where it was quite a bit above the handlebar stem. The 52cm was level with the handlebars. Maybe I was more comfortable because it was more upright?

[OakLeaf]

I have over a 31" inseam so basically no torso.

So that means that top tube length is going to be really critical for you, and if they're talking about putting a super short stem on the 52 cm bike to compensate, that could adversely affect the handling.

Seatposts generally have a lot of room to play with, so it's your torso length and arm reach that should determine your frame size, not your leg length.

[salsabike]

Kelly, honest to God, the extra $150 or whatever it is there for a bike fit would be SO well worth it. It's depressing to get a bike and then find out over the next few months that it's really too big--I've done that. Had a bike with a top tube way too long for me and had to get a different bike. And I got a bike fit before I bought the next one, which I love!

[ACiveE]

I've been doing the same thing... going around to different shops, test riding, etc. I would suggest you shell out the $100 or whatever it is and get a professional fit. I actually went to three fitters... paid $100 for one, $50 for another, and the other ended up being free because I just purchased a bike there. Everyone stressed how you need to find a bike that *felt* right but I feared that I didn't really know what *right* meant and that I was going to buy an ill fitted bike. So I got fitted... three times. Excessive? Probably. When all measurements and recommendations came out to about the same, I decided that I had found a match.

Everyone stressed looking at womens specific bike initially but I just ended up purchasing a mens model because it just fit better. I'm not that tall, only about 5'5" but was fit by multiple shops to a 54cm Trek Madone WSD or the 51cm Cannondale Synapse. The Cannondale comes in WSD but the mens model fit better. A little bit of adjustment and I am hoping it'll be perfect. The actual geometry and measurements vary a ton... I thought a 54 was a 54 but that wasn't the case at all.

Gooooood luck!

[Eden]

Sounds like you may have a bit of a quandary..... It sounds like the shop could not put the seat post up any further on the smaller bike (there is an upper height limit having to do with the amount of post still in the seat tube), but you have a bit of a reach problem with the larger bike....

Being stretched out is never that great - you have less control and less power on the bike. If you can avoid trying to adapt a bike that is too long you'd probably be better off, but you certainly cannot put the seat post up too far - that's plain dangerous. I'm actually wondering if you might want to look into a smaller frame with non-compact geometry bike? Then there'd be less seat post out, but a shorter top tube. If I were you, I'd try looking at a 50cm non-wsd Trek 2.1 - I think it might solve your problem. The seat tube is longer and though the top tube is a bit longer too, it is not as long as the 52 wsd.