Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 32

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    there are limits to what Photoshop can achieve without it looking pretty obvious (just as airbrushing used to look pretty obvious when taken too far in the days before computers...) It does mean that makeup artists, stylists and photographers can afford to be a bit more sloppy these days... you can fix it later...., but most of the tricks they use these days have been done before. It just took more effort.

    I won't argue that it gives a sense of beauty that is basically not achievable.... if even the women who are already deemed to be the most beautiful in the world end up getting digitally enhanced.... I would be much more interesting to see a comparison of the actual original shot to see what was really changed. With the lighting difference and that they really smoothed out and pinned back her shorts its a little harder to tell. (you want faked, that might be some of the worst of it... those shorts are so pinned back that she probably can't move from that position.... that's why clothes on store manikins look so good too and so often don't look nearly as nice when tried on.... safety pin tailoring....)
    Last edited by Eden; 12-09-2008 at 09:09 AM.
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Dang. I like Campari.

    I agree it's not the same shot though. Things like the eyes, the expression of the mouth, the folds in the shorts, yeah they COULD change it all (read a Photoshop User magazine sometime), but at some point it's less work for the photographer to just shoot the dang thing over again.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    1,460
    There's a lot of "photoshopping" in the pictures, but I agree that they're 2 different photos. Even the background is different... along with the lighting, etc. that people have pointed out.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    the background is probably dropped in.... that you can do with relative ease... the hardest part is getting it all behind the hair without making it look fake. The photos really are too low res to take a good look.

    Maybe with a huge amount of work you could smooth out the shorts as much as has been done, but it would be a big job to do it without making it look really unnatural...

    The lighting could never be changed so drastically.
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Limbo
    Posts
    8,769
    Smoothing out those shorts is easy, like taking wrinkles out of a face.
    Highlights can be added giving the effect of different lighting.
    I'm not great at Photoshop but I know some and I'm pretty sure it's the same shot.
    2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
    2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
    2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    4,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Zen View Post
    Smoothing out those shorts is easy, like taking wrinkles out of a face.
    Highlights can be added giving the effect of different lighting.
    I'm not great at Photoshop but I know some and I'm pretty sure it's the same shot.
    I'm a professional photographer, I can assure you that it is not.
    "Sharing the road means getting along, not getting ahead" - 1994 Washington State Driver's Guide

    visit my flickr stream http://flic.kr/ps/MMu5N

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Limbo
    Posts
    8,769
    Quote Originally Posted by Eden View Post
    I'm a professional photographer
    As am I.
    We'll just have to disagree
    2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
    2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
    2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •