Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 3311

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    What's even worse in DC is the summers - where it's 95 degrees out + 95% humidity, and the air conditioning makes it 70 degrees indoors....

    So if you dress for the weather, you freeze to death inside.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    2,024
    Well, I am a bit disappointed by the hooded shak, probably it will go back. It does let me add another layer, but it fits kind of like a sack or sweat shirt, not the sleek fit of the full zip shaks.

    Catriona, the fabric is thinner than the full zip shak, and the cut is longer, although I am comparing a medium hoodie to a small full zip. Perhaps I don't like the cut cuz I got the medium, and while it layers just fine over my small full zip shak, the cut of the sleeves makes me start to feel too constricted around my arm pits yet its baggy around my torso. I also don't like the finger thingies either, and not sure I really need the hood since I have plenty of hats and neck gaitors (and it looks goofy on me). So..........back it goes.

    But, the good news is I tried Lisa's suggestion of layering more under my shak. I didn't think I had room, but I got two midweight shirts under just fine (a norgie crew and zepher zip T in the same color, both smalls, and it looks cool together). Then I put my medium PI gavia jacket over that and my medium arc'tyrex parka over that, and had plenty of room to move since the sleeves of the gavia are less constricting than double shaking felt. I also like that my top 3 layers are full zips as I move indoors.

    I like the woolie bottoms, they are very soft, and fit well, although they come quite high above my natural waist, and they are a tad long. Can I expect them to shrink a little? But, I am not sure that coming up so high is such a big deal, since its covered by my shirts. What surprised me is that they fit even under my slimmest cut size 4 pants. So, now I have to decide if I shouldn't worry about them coming so high. I did try a smartwool bottom on in a store and it was lower cut, so I could replace them with those. But I have had better luck with Ibex over smartwool, so not sure what to do. I think I'll probably keep them, Perhaps having the waistband come some high will just keep me warmer and helps them fit better under pants.

    Catriona, you were a great help to me today! I know I went a little crazy on the pants order, but I really need to try this stuff on. I do hope I like the fit of the alpstar pant, as its my favorite from the pix and description, and I may have ordered too large on some since I keep overestimating my size, but that's in part cuz I lost 35 pounds 1.5 years ago, but still can't accept that I am really small on the bottom. I was really surprised how much looser small woolies felt than the small smartwool midweight tights I tried on in a store. I just can't seem to figure out my size.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    2,024
    Well I am finally 'getting it'. You guys must think I am such an idiot, but its really hard to figure out how to dress in a place that is a lot colder than where you live. But I woke up this morning, and it was cold in my house (remember no central heating) which made it a lot easier to try things own.

    I continued to explore Lisa's idea of putting two base layers under a shak. DUH........ why didn't I try it before? I think cuz it was already so close fitting but its fine. Today I paired a kate with a norgie crew. Then I dug out my LLBean fleece in small sizes from 20 years ago, and it paired over that just great, with or without a shak underneath. So, I am absolutely set on top.

    I was sitting in my freezing cold family room drinking coffee (just fired up the gas radiator but it hadn't kicked in yet, and never gets the large space it has to heat terribly warm), toasty warm on top, but cold on the bottom. SO, I slipped a pair of woolies on under my jeans. Yeh, the waistband sits higher than the top of my jeans, but with the kate tucked in over it no one can tell. Hmmm, toasty warm. Warm enough to go to the cold garage and dig out my husband's winter clothes (as he stayed indoors wrapped in a down comforter). These are a keeper..........

    I don't know why I thought I needed to size up my clothes to fit more layers underneath. These pieces are so thin its just not a problem. A guy in an outdoor shop explained to me that the shaks are really designed to wear over a base, not over another shak, which is why sizing up just didn't work for me. He also pressed me to get smalls when I wasn't sure on stuff, explaining that these layers are designed to fit close to the body to work well.

    For layering over my shak, I decided that I like garments that are my size (small), but designed for layering so they had wider arms. I know double shaking works great for a lot of you, but maybe my arms are thicker or something. But, the good news is that since my daughter is coming home for thanksgiving next week, I can let her try on all the medium stuff I ordered and see if any of it works for her before making the return packages (and its very hard for her to find time to shop as a busy student which is why she asked me to get her the woolies in the first place). I bet the hooded shak is a great piece for a college student in boston who doesn't own any ibex yet, its a beautiful garment it just doesn't fit me.......... I also ordered on the midlayer zip Ts on TE with the coupon in M, but now realize it won't fit, but it would also look lovely with her grey suit or under a shak..... She recently lost 20 lb and went form a L to a M, so she also needs some new clothes. SO, now I don't feel so ridiculous that I ordered so many things in so many diff. sizes, maybe I'll help her also even out her wardrobe.

    I am so glad I bought the arc'tyrex parka. I got the idea from Catriona's response to wackyjacky who querried about columbia 3-in-1s. I have an old columbia 3-in-1 but its too big, so I too was looking for a better approach. I knew in theory layering under a goretex shell was better, but then it took me a long time to figure out exactly how to do it. I bought most of my ibex on closeout last year, so it was a bit random, but now I am finally figuring it all out. Some of what I need to do in europe is professional, some is vacation, some is active sports, and I am still amazed how I can combine the very same pieces in different ways to generate combinations that work for all 3. That is why I am a wool weenie/ibex addict!
    Last edited by Triskeliongirl; 11-22-2008 at 07:12 AM.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •