Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,414
    It's hard to say. Depends on the bike, the setup, and her proportions. You can get a rough idea of whether her torso is much shorter than yours or not by comparing inseams. If her inseam is much longer than yours, she probably needs a smaller frame. (Because her torso is relatively smaller for the same height).

    As to bike frame size --
    I'm 5'6".

    I have a 52cm Bianchi Axis that fits me perfectly. It has a 53.9 cm virtual top tube. I'm running a 90mm stem with a substantial positive rise, maybe 10 degrees.

    I also have a 49cm Scott Contessa CR1 pro that fits me beautifully. It has a 51.5 cm virtual top tube. I'm running a 120mm -6 degree stem on it.

    The Scott is a much more aggressive position with much more saddle-bar drop, but both bikes fit me well and they are very different frame sizes and setups.

    So it's just hard to say . But it's worth a try. It seems at least plausible that your bikes could fit her.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    I'm 5'5". I have a 54cm Rivendell which is 'about' the right size, though I could probably be comfy on their 52cm as well (never tried one though).
    No one needs more than a 1/2" of standover, technically speaking. That's about what I have on my Riv.
    You ought to measure and compare your two heights from floor to pubic bone however- that's more accurate and will tell you more than overall body height.
    Here's how:
    http://www.rivbike.com/article/bike_..._to_measure_it
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,609
    Quote Originally Posted by BleeckerSt_Girl View Post
    No one needs more than a 1/2" of standover, technically speaking.
    Even on a cross bike?
    For 3 days, I get to part of a thousand other journeys.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riding my Luna & Rivendell in the Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    8,411
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedal Wench View Post
    Even on a cross bike?
    What i mean is, lots of people get nervous when they have less than one or two inches of clearance- but you can get as close as 1/2" standover clearance and still be just fine. I'm talking bikes in general, not cross bike geometry specifically.
    Lisa
    My mountain dulcimer network...FOTMD.com...and my mountain dulcimer blog
    My personal blog:My blog
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedal Wench View Post
    Even on a cross bike?
    I think that's what makes her uncomfortable the most.. There's not much room down there.

    Though, I was concerned about that myself at first, I can probably lift up my front wheel about an inch when standing over it. It was kind of scary knowing how close it was at first, but it's not really a problem.. yet.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10
    Unfortunately, the Surly has a 54cm TT..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,414
    It might be OK. As I said, my Axis (which is a CX bike) has a 53.9 tt -- I don't think that 0.1 cm would make that much difference . What kind of stem do you have on it?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by liza View Post
    It might be OK. As I said, my Axis (which is a CX bike) has a 53.9 tt -- I don't think that 0.1 cm would make that much difference . What kind of stem do you have on it?
    A 120 at the moment.. I'll put the 90 from my current bike onto that one to see how she likes it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,841
    I think you want a bit more than half an inch for a cross bike and definitely more for a mountain bike.

    Hower, road bikes I think standover height is somewhat overrated - as long as I don't feel like I'm racking myself, I'm fine with whatever on road bikes.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Beautiful NW or Left Coast
    Posts
    5,619
    the bike feels too big for her. The top tube is 54cm. That might just be too long for her reach!
    what's wrong with the smaller bike you bought her?
    I like Bikes - Mimi
    Watercolor Blog

    Davidson Custom Bike - Cavaletta
    Dahon 2009 Sport - Luna
    Old Raleigh Mixte - Mitzi

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Biciclista View Post
    the bike feels too big for her. The top tube is 54cm. That might just be too long for her reach!
    what's wrong with the smaller bike you bought her?
    It has track ends and not enough clearance to run knobby tires.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    510
    I'm 5'4.5" and normally proportioned, although I have long arms.

    My road (Merlin Atreus) and cross (LeMond Poprad) bikes are both 49cm, with ca. 52cm TT and I use short (80 and 90 mm) stems and short-reach handlebars.

    My sister is a tad taller and rides and Airborne 54cm, which I don't get, but she likes.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Belle, Mo.
    Posts
    1,778
    Quote Originally Posted by 1150A View Post
    Unfortunately, the Surly has a 54cm TT..
    Yup! The Surly Cross Check sizing is mis-leading. I have a 46cm Cross Check and it is larger than my 53cm Burly was. Has 52.8cm top tube which is perfect for me, and your effective top tube is actually 54.7. I also have about a 31.5" inseam which is somewhat long for my height, 5'5" on a good day. Mine has a 29.6" standover whereas your 52cm has a 30.6". Not sure I'd like it that close.
    Claudia

    2009 Trek 7.6fx
    2013 Jamis Satellite
    2014 Terry Burlington

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    848
    use this: http://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...LCULATOR_INTRO

    it'll get ya into a decent ball park and then you'll know how you might play around with stems and what not to get the fit in the ball park or.. if it jsut outright might not be a good fit.

    though this is more road oriented fit. i dunno if cross might have a slightly different fit since typically the bb are higher than road bikes.

    again, this'll probably get you in the ball park and reduce your guessing range ..?

    anyway, it'll be fun and interesting. did this with a friend.. and we had lots of laughs and "argued" over the measurements, requiring 2 or 3 measurements. i measured myself and then had an lbs fit and it put me in the general ballpark. your results may differ.. depending on who wins the argument
    Last edited by roguedog; 04-01-2010 at 07:40 AM.
    Push the pedal down watch the world around fly by us

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •