I've seen rides where riders are asked to submit their data from Polars, GPS units, whatever... I assume the ride organizer looks at all the numbers and makes some determination.
Did you see this for the Hilly Hundred?
http://www.hillyhundred.org/PDF_Files/Hills.pdf
Those aren't hills; most of those are rollers.
Remember max incline could be from one spot on the hill, not the entire hill. It would be like saying our Mount Diablo is a ten mile 18% climb, just because the last tenth of a mile is 18%.
Veronica
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.
No, I did not do the math.
It's all in you definition of hill. If it takes me just a few minutes to get over it, it's not a hill. My 27 mile ride with 1,280 feet of climbing gets labeled rollers, not hills because none of the hills take very long to get over. Not even the ones that require me to go into my small ring.
Veronica
okay - we've wrangled over what's a "hill" before (I think probably NOBODY except for Alpinerabbit would claim they ride "mountains" - don't we have anyone in the Rockies?)
But now the gauntlet's laid down.
V., come over here and ride the Columbus Fall Challenge next year (provided they hold it - they've had organization trouble the last couple of years). I'll train and do it with you. Similar type of terrain to the Hilly, but about 1.5x more climbing per mile, and 110+/- miles each day. That's a ride I was afraid to do when I was racing and I'm still a little afraid now that I'm braver but not nearly as strong. But I challenge you to do that ride next year and THEN say they're not hills.
Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler
Sorry, I can't travel to Columbus Ohio in the middle of the school year.
You could come do DMD with me in April.
I'm hoping to finish this time. In 2006 I got to the top of Mt. Hamilton and my lower back quit. It's a lot stronger now.
In this profile - Diablo and Hamilton are mountains, all the rest are hills. Of course others opinions will vary. I do label this ride steep at BJ because of the nature of the hills.
Veronica
Last edited by Veronica; 10-21-2008 at 03:55 AM.
April? 105-mile-a-day, nice and flat TOSRV is too much for May for those who don't winter in the South!
Girl, I never said you aren't strong!!! Don't ever think I said that! I don't doubt you could do CFC in your sleep.
Just don't dis our terrain or the riders here. Like my one riding buddy who did the Cinderella Century this year on a rented, poorly fitting mountain bike (the last bike she could get on short notice). And passed a whole lot of people while she was at it - she tells a story about how her knobby tires were making so much noise, people would yell "Car Back!" before she passed them.All of her training was here in the heartland, except for Mountain Mama, a little bit south of us - looks to be at least as many feet/mile as DMD, if half the distance - lots of people from our area did Mt. Mama, with no training on what you would consider "hills," and they finished it just fine (including one guy who broke his wrist early on and finished the ride anyway, but he's just nuts
).
Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler
Do people not notice Smiley Faces? I wasn't dissin anyone's terrain.
It's very different from where I typically ride. I'm always surprised at how high the reported average speeds are for these rides in the Midwest with the amount of climbing that they have. Since it's not the sort of stuff I ride, I'm trying to reconcile the numbers in my brain. So here's my current thinkin'...
On a climb like Diablo, I'll average between 7 and 8 miles an hour for ten miles. The descent doesn't allow me to make up much speed because it's so twisty. I'll average around twenty, maybe twenty-two if I'm lucky and feeling brave, on the descent.
In that link I posted there's only 6 miles of climbing on Saturday's route. I assume that same 7 - 8 mile an hour climbing pace, although because the climbs are shorter, a rider could climb faster. I also assume that the downhills are less twisty. I haven't been there, so I could be wrongBut if that is true, a rider would get more speed on the downhills and maybe average closer to 30 mph. That would all lead to a much higher average speed than I get on a typical ride with 3,500 feet of climbing.
Like I said it's very different from where I ride.
Veronica