Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 35

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    3,997
    My 2c
    I have only ever ridden a triple off-road on my entry-level mountain bike.

    I have a 10 speed compact crank set on what is now my training bike (roadie). 50-34 on the front, 27-12 on the back. I raced on my EMC2 FemetapePro for about a year before getting a better race bike and turning this one into a pure road-training bike. I climbed several hills with gradients of 15-18%, I am no hill climber and did not have to get off and walk, though at times I was only going at 4 -5kph.

    It does everything I require - my smallest gear gets me up hills, my biggest gear allows me , on the flat, to crank it up to about 35kph for short bursts (or about 48kph for ages with a tail wind).

    The only issue I had with the compact was when I first got it (and sometimes still have), was changing in the middle of the block - sometimes I couldn't quite find the 'right' gear to be in and would spend some time changing around trying to find the 'right' place to be. That was no good during racing.

    But apart from that it does everything I need.
    Last edited by RoadRaven; 10-19-2008 at 09:38 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    747
    To me, this answers the question:

    I live in a very hilly area, and I did notice that when climbing, I was wishing for some smaller gears.
    If you are wishing for them on the test ride, you are going to have times when you want them. I'd go for a triple.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    3,997
    I agree with xeney, but only if the triple actually gives you a lower gear then a compact set, or 'normal' double.

    Sometimes a triple gives no true advantage, and adds only the complexity of an extra ring to contend with.

    Sometimes the only real advantage is psychological, that is, "the shop guy tells me if you have a triple I can climb anything, and I have a triple, therefore I can"

    Sometimes cyclists new to understanding bikes and gearing dont get told (or dont believe - like me) that sometimes it is easier to go up a gear to climb a hill and NOT be in your lowest gear.

    Bluetree makes a great point early in this thread - a triple weighs more than a double, and if you want to get up a hill more quickly every little bit you shed helps.

    Ask at the shop what the options are in terms of lowest gearing and then bring all the numbers back to us if you feel unsure...

    For example, here are my stats [front // back // lowest gear]:

    50-34 // 27-12 // 34-27(training bike) - gets me up a local 800metre, 18% climb at about 4.8kph

    53-39 // 27-12 // 39-27 (road race bike) - tough on a hill but do-able as the bike itself is very light and responsive

    52-39 // 27-13 // 39-27 (time trial road bike) - but I avoid hills on this because the bike itself is heavy. The low front end combined with aero bars makes hills difficult and uncomfortable

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •