
Originally Posted by
katluvr
So why did they change it??? Hmmmmmmm

So are we moving forward w/ the new???
My impressions comparing the two plans -
In the "old" plan, you started with a larger number of pups, then decreased the number each set until the final max-out. In the "new" one, the first set is essentially a warmup, the second set is the highest fixed number, then the third and fourth sets have a lower number (in weeks 5 and 6, the fourth set has more than the third, but still fewer than the second).
In the "old" plan, your minimum on the last set was generally slightly fewer than the first set. In the "new" one, your minimum on the last set is several more than the second set. As the plan goes on, the max-out becomes a greater and greater multiple of what you did in the fixed sets, whereas in the "old" plan, your minimum max-out is never greater than what you'd already done in a fixed set at least once that week.
Both plans seem to use the odd-numbered weeks to make big jumps, and the even-numbered ones to consolidate gains, but the increases are a bit more gradual in the "new" plan.
I'm far from an expert on this stuff, but it seems to me that under the old plan, there was a larger risk of "stalling out" in the later weeks, while the new one may force many (most?) people to repeat weeks earlier on, but continue to progress through the plan.
As I said in the other thread... repeating a week is NOT a failure! I really believe this plan should've been laid out for at least 10-12 weeks to begin with (rather than six weeks with most people needing to repeat several weeks), just to give people a better psychological sense of success and progress. If you're increasing the number of pups you can do, you ARE succeeding.
Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler