Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 32

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Off eating cake.
    Posts
    1,700
    What a bunch of short stuffs we are! Well, not everyone, but there are more people in this thread who are shorter than me than taller and that sure doesn't reflect my real life experience!

    By the way, Corsair-wealth-of-information-Mac, I'd have had no idea how long my cranks were if I couldn't have looked it up on the Gary Fisher website.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Concord, MA
    Posts
    13,394
    I have no idea what size my cranks are, but from reading this, I bet they're 165s (Trek 5200 WSD with 650 wheels). I was thinking the same thing about our collective height! I am 5' 1" (though I may have shrunk a bit?) and it seems like there are tons of people on this list that are my height... do you think there are more women cyclists who are short for any specific reason?
    I just got back from a bike tour with Trek travel. The bike i used was the updated version of my bike (a Madone 5.2). Somehow, in updating the design, they managed to put 700 wheels on a 47 cm bike. I spent half of the trip getting used to the feeling of being higher up and the different feeling of turning with larger wheels. i did not like it at all! Maybe it's my poor spatial abilities, but I liked getting back to my own teeny bike with teeny wheels. A creature of habit, I guess.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    1,852
    i've grown since i began working out! lol!

    i'm 5'3" (made hubby remeasure about 6 times cuz i didn't believe it!!!!!!!!!!) (i was 5'2" or a bit over for years!)

    crank: 167.5
    bike: 51 (but it's too big )

    i've been told i could use a 170 with my inseam (28" if i remember correctly)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    3,997
    I'm 5'10" (unlike cali I have shrunk an inch since I was a teen)

    I have a 54" frame bike and my cranks are 175


    Just of interest for you crank-ophiles, my partner is 6'3".
    His TimeTrial bike is a 58" frame, and with his 83cm seat height (he has very long legs) he has had custom cranks made (which were cheaper to have made and delivered from America, than to have done locally).
    185 cranks on his 58"TT frame.


    Courage does not always roar. Sometimes, it is the quiet voice at the end of the day saying,
    "I will try again tomorrow".


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    127
    On a ride this past Tuesday with the assistant manager of my LBS, a crank length discussion came up. She said the the latest thinking in the bike world is that 172.5 is right for the majority of riders, no matter what height.
    PS. I'm currently 5'4" and using 170's on my road bike and hybrid, and feel that they fit perfectly. Road bike is C-Dale r800 50 cm frame.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Traveling Nomad
    Posts
    6,763
    I'm 5'2" with a 28" inseam and use 170mm cranks on my road and mtn bikes. My slightly older Terry bike has 165mm cranks. Both are fine, but I chose 170s when I custom built my Aegis Swift and Bike Friday as I felt they'd give me more leverage on hills (and hopefully not kill my knees), and on my Aegis I wanted a compact double, which didn't come in a smaller length than 170. They seem to agree with me fine, even though all the charts say I should ride a 165mm or shorter crank based on my inseam.

    Emily
    Emily

    2011 Jamis Dakar XC "Toto" - Selle Italia Ldy Gel Flow
    2007 Trek Pilot 5.0 WSD "Gloria" - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow
    2004 Bike Friday Petite Pocket Crusoe - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    20

    Forgot to answer my own POLL Q



    5' 4"
    170mm factory-issue on GT Mtn

    6 mos later, after "car vs. me" incident, the LBS (s) didn't have 170's to fit & I was off to Vancouver (from Toronto) w/ 175's instead.
    Naively didn't know any different, so said "ok, 175's fine"... yet no probs in Vancouver despite hills + 8 hr days on the bike...
    Back to T.O., switched to SPD's (great!float ok, super-duper fun etc.) but: 3 mos. later Knee Probs, taking me right off the bike ... for months sigh ...

    Then, GT recall on crank set, shop now had 170's again, so went BACK to 170's.

    Many calls to Different Shops here have resulted in the speech: "165's? 167.5's? Uh .... lady, those are hard to find..."
    Note: I'm not looking for fluorescent polka-dot fun-fur custom cranks. But still, this response. I take my business elsewhere & same thing happens..?
    Since I'm not overly mechanically minded, I do not know if whatever crank set (ordered on the 'net for instance) would fit the bike's BB etc... Among a zillion other Q's I suppose ...

    ANYWAY:
    Sill knee probs... surgeries...gave up for a while (a few years)... now, back in "Stubborn/Optimistic/Delusional(?) Mode", trying to figure out what the KEY(S) to this PUZZLE could be. I say "key(s)" since I've tried what seems to be everything under the sun. Any other types of leg-based exercise (running, weights, etc. = zero knee probs). On-the-bike puzzle though, you name it, I've most probably tried it.

    Hence the CRANKS POLL Questions.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •