Well after 20 miles on my new saddle, the Inform RL, I'm not sure what to think.
First I should note that my old saddle was pretty comfortable. Sometimes it would hurt on long rides, usually on flatter terrain, which I guess is because I don't move around on the seat as much when I'm not climbing. The pain was clearly due to too much pressure on the narrow part in front. But the saddle is old and getting worn out so I figured it's time to look into a new one. The old one (a Juliana, which they stopped making about 5 years ago) is t-shaped with no cutout. I measured the widest part and it's about 155 mm wide.
So I did the sit-bone measurement at the LBS and they said I was "in between" and therefore recommended I try the narrower saddle, which is 140 mm. Okay, so it's narrower than the old one, but I'm keeping an open mind here. It's also more pear shaped. But I'm willing to test it.
I did a quick ride (10 minutes or so) yesterday when I first got it and it was okay. It feels harder than the old saddle, but there is definitely more weight on the sit bones and less pressure on the front, which is good.
After today's ride I felt a little chafed, which might be because of the pear-shape. Or maybe it's because the weight is distributed differently on this saddle compared to the old one? Anyway overall I felt okay.
So the jury is still out. Tomorrow I'm hoping to ride for 30 miles or so, and this time I'll use chamois butt'r. So maybe I'll know more then.
I am kind of wondering if I'd be better off with the wider version (150 mm), but if chafing turns out to be the main issue than I don't think wider would be better.
To be continued...




Reply With Quote
. Just when I think I've about got it nailed on a saddle, this ugly beastly spot rears it's head for a hello. 