Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 42

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    This is probably a re-post, but since I didn't see it on this thread, here it is again: when you park your bike, make sure your wheel and crank are aligned so that the wheel sensor and cadence sensor are NOT aligned with the pickup on the chainstay. If they are, the transmitter will continue to send, and the battery will go dead very quickly.

    Same thing with the HR strap: don't put it on until you're ready to ride, and take it off as soon as you're done with your workout, even if you won't have a chance to change clothes right away. As long as it's on your body, it's sending and using battery.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    1,626
    oh, i remember reading that, but i think i also remember not really quite understanding (admitting to still learning a lot of the terminology).
    You too can help me fight cancer, and get a lovely cookbook for your very own! My team's cookbook is for sale Click here to order. Proceeds go to our team's fundraising for the Philly Livestrong Challenge!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tulsa
    Posts
    307

    Wink Help me again!

    Okay, I admit... since originally posting this (weeks ago?), I've gone back-n-forth trying to decide whether this was a worthwhile investment... It DOES sound/look cool as heck, but after reading/re-reading reviews from buyers on sites like Amazon.com and others, I have lingering concerns.

    Do any of you think your speed is inconsistently measured? (the ones w/o the cadence/speed thingee) I've never had a wireless device -other than a hr strap- so it seems a little disconcerting to hear reviewers say its wrong a lot. I'm planning to just get the HR version - I don't really care about cadence anymore after having the PowerTap for so long. (its off the bike now)

    Do you find the altitude measurement to be inconsistent? That's a lot of the reason why I'm considering this one over others. I wanna track climbing and know the gradient of the hill I'm on.

    Mostly, I just want reassurance that you guys have been happy with the product (other than it just being cool, I mean). You don't feel like you need a cheapo Cateye on the bike to make sure the Garmin is right?

    Sorry to be so questioning..those darn reviewers made me second guess my choice. But...I need to make up my mind quickly now b/c at the moment, my bike is nekkid - NO computer! Its like riding blind! It was nice for the first hr of my Wed night ride, but after that, I felt like I was really missing something.
    2009 Giant Avail Advanced 1
    2008 Trek FX 7.5 (Commuter)

    Baby Blue..retired to new rider: 2006 Giant OCR-C

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Before I got my 705, I did have a cheapo Cateye on my bike as well as the Forerunner 301, because the old Forerunners didn't have a cadence sensor.

    There's a slight delay in any consumer-grade GPS realtime data - that's just a matter of how often it looks at your position and how long it takes the processor to interpret what it gets from the satellites. By "slight" I mean 3-4 seconds. Any time I was at a constant speed, the GPS speed reading was spot-on identical to what the Cateye read, and at the end of the ride, the overall distance was within a half a percent. The newer GPS units will be more accurate than that, both because of the more sensitive receivers and the more frequent recording.

    Elevation isn't ever going to be perfect with a consumer-grade unit. Once you download it to where the computer can compare it against known map points, the accuracy is greater, but still neither perfect nor perfectly consistent.

    If I were racing in the TdF, I'd probably have my team manager go out and drive the route with a $20,000 military/commercial grade GPS loaded in the car and then I'd know the elevation data was very accurate. For my own use (data geek mainly, and hopelessly directionally challenged), I'm absolutely delighted with my Garmin 705.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by BabyBlueNTulsa View Post
    Okay, I admit... since originally posting this (weeks ago?), I've gone back-n-forth trying to decide whether this was a worthwhile investment... It DOES sound/look cool as heck, but after reading/re-reading reviews from buyers on sites like Amazon.com and others, I have lingering concerns.

    Do any of you think your speed is inconsistently measured? (the ones w/o the cadence/speed thingee) I've never had a wireless device -other than a hr strap- so it seems a little disconcerting to hear reviewers say its wrong a lot. I'm planning to just get the HR version - I don't really care about cadence anymore after having the PowerTap for so long. (its off the bike now)

    Do you find the altitude measurement to be inconsistent? That's a lot of the reason why I'm considering this one over others. I wanna track climbing and know the gradient of the hill I'm on.

    Mostly, I just want reassurance that you guys have been happy with the product (other than it just being cool, I mean). You don't feel like you need a cheapo Cateye on the bike to make sure the Garmin is right?

    Sorry to be so questioning..those darn reviewers made me second guess my choice. But...I need to make up my mind quickly now b/c at the moment, my bike is nekkid - NO computer! Its like riding blind! It was nice for the first hr of my Wed night ride, but after that, I felt like I was really missing something.
    I rode with my cateye AND my Garmin for the first year and found the data very very close. My speed was always the same on both while I rode and my mileage was super close. I believe the elevation data is pretty accurate altho I imagine it's off sometimes. It always shows and the same elevation when I leave and any anomalies are supposed to be corrected when I upload to motionbased altho I admit I don't understand the process.

    I love my Garmin.
    It is never too late to be what you might have been. ~ George Elliot


    My podcast about being a rookie triathlete:Kelownagurl Tris Podcast

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tulsa
    Posts
    307
    Thank you thank you ladies!

    Oak..the 705 looks DREAMY. Wish I could rationalize another $500 computer on my bike..but oh well, right? Since I don't often go long enough to get lost, I don't suppose I need it..though it would be cool! Perhaps I could make NEW routes easier with something like that though...

    Your responses have been very helpful to my decision making here. Now I get to shop for the best price! Lowest I've seen so far on the 305 is $225. Not bad...

    Thanks again!!
    2009 Giant Avail Advanced 1
    2008 Trek FX 7.5 (Commuter)

    Baby Blue..retired to new rider: 2006 Giant OCR-C

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Blessed to be all over the place!
    Posts
    3,433
    For those unfamiliar with motionbased (uploads garmin data onto the internet and calibrates it...)

    Check out the link I added to the July 19 rides thread.

    http://forums.teamestrogen.com/showthread.php?t=25114
    If you don't grow where you're planted, you'll never BLOOM - Will Rogers

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,506
    Mr. S, I looked at your ride and now know your first name.

    do you not have a cadence sensor?

    You are getting much faster, I'm jealous.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •