Usually, it's the total elevation gain over the ride. So, you go up - and it adds to the number. You go down, it doesn't subtract. For 50 miles, I'd say that's middle of the road.
CA
Usually, it's the total elevation gain over the ride. So, you go up - and it adds to the number. You go down, it doesn't subtract. For 50 miles, I'd say that's middle of the road.
CA
Most days in life don't stand out, But life's about those days that will...
For myself I consider any ride that averages 40-50 feet of climbing/mile to be mildly challenging, anything over 50 to be challenging. Your ride is 40ft/mi. That falls into my mildy challenging range. YMMV.
I'd rather be swimming...biking...running...and eating cheesecake...
--===--
2008 Cervelo P2C Tri bike
2011 Trek Madone 5.5/Cobb V-Flow Max
2007 Jamis Coda/Terry Liberator
2011 Trek Mamba 29er
Yeah, but if it's a GPS-only unit that measured the climbing, rather than a barometric altimeter measurement, the numbers are high. I think MDHillSlug's ft per mile comparison is a good guideline.
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.
Thanks so much ladies!!
It makes more sense now. I promise I will get back to you after the ride and let you know how it went.
I like the idea of "mildly challenging."
And I'm planning on having a blast, hilly or not!
Lynette
50 miles done! A really beautiful ride. I would highly recommend it.
And it wasn't too hilly. Mildly challenging was a good description. Lots of hills, but none of them "killer hills."
Now I will have a better idea of figuring out climbing grades for future rides.
Thanks again,
Lynette
Congratulations! Job well done.![]()
Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.
Yay! Good for you!
Sarah
When it's easy, ride hard; when it's hard, ride easy.
2011 Volagi Liscio
2010 Pegoretti Love #3 "Manovelo"
2011 Mercian Vincitore Special
2003 Eddy Merckx Team SC - stolen
2001 Colnago Ovalmaster Stars and Stripes