Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    979
    Quote Originally Posted by sundial View Post
    Hey Deb, I have a Roubaix with a 11-27 cassette. Can I get one with more gearing (correct term?) for steep climbing?
    9 or a 10 speed?

    I think 27 is as high as it goes for 10 speeds.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,867
    I got all that part, but what confuses me is the word SPEED.

    I rode 10-speeds in high school. I don't think it's the same thing anymore, right?

    Karen

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    747
    Well, it sort of is, except in the 70s they were talking about the total number of gear combinations, and now it refers just to the rear cassette.

    Your 10-speed then had a total of ten total gear combinations available -- probably a double up front and a five-speed in the back. Now the 9 versus 10 speed designation refers only to the rear cassette: so if you have a triple chain ring up front and a 10-speed cassette in the rear, that means you have a total of 30 gear combinations available. If you have a double chain ring in the front and a 9-speed cassette in the rear, you have 18 gear combinations.

    But 18-speed and 30-speed sound sort of ridiculous so the terminology has changed. I do see Craigslist ads advertising "27-speed women's bike," though.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Md suburbs of Wash. DC
    Posts
    2,131
    Quote Originally Posted by xeney View Post
    ...so if you have a triple chain ring up front and a 10-speed cassette in the rear, that means you have a total of 30 gear combinations available. If you have a double chain ring in the front and a 9-speed cassette in the rear, you have 18 gear combinations.
    Except that, to complicate things even further, you really don't have 30 gear combinations available, unless you intend to cross-chain and wear your components out prematurely. With a triple up front and 10 in the rear, you really only have (you more knowledgeable folks correct me if I'm wrong here) 15-20 gear combinations you can (should) actually use. Doesn't that make this even more fun?

    I'm the Queen of Cross-Chaining. Thank goodness I have a compact crank and only 8-speeds
    "How about if we all just try to follow these very simple rules of the road? Drive like the person ahead on the bike is your son/daughter. Ride like the cars are ambulances carrying your loved ones to the emergency room. This should cover everything, unless you are a complete sociopath."
    David Desautels, in a letter to velonews.com

    Random babblings and some stuff to look at.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Between the Blue Ridge and the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    5,203
    Kinda makes me want to get a fixie.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,867
    Quote Originally Posted by xeney View Post
    Well, it sort of is, except in the 70s they were talking about the total number of gear combinations, and now it refers just to the rear cassette.
    That's the most forthright and direct explanation I've ever read. THANKS.

    I know about cross chaining so I get why you don't have ex. 30 total gear combos.

    whew, I can sleep tonight!

    Karen

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Phillipston, MA
    Posts
    445
    SRAM has an 11-28 cassette for 10 speeds in their Force group. No 11-28 for 9 speeds. You'd have to go to a mountain cassette after that. Ilima describes the setup in the OP wonderfully.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    foothills of the Ozarks aka Tornado Alley
    Posts
    4,193
    Quote Originally Posted by madscot13 View Post
    9 or a 10 speed?

    I think 27 is as high as it goes for 10 speeds.
    SRAM OG-1070, 10-speed 11-28t

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    Actually, IRD makes a 10 spd cassette to 34 but you need a rear derailleur with the capacity for it.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    3,932
    Chain close to you as you pedal: easier pedaling (you're in the small chainring at the front and big cog at the back).

    Chain away from you: harder pedaling (you're in the big chainring at the front and small cog at the back).

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Md suburbs of Wash. DC
    Posts
    2,131
    Here's what I don't get about the way cog sets are put together:

    There's a small differential between the higher gears, say 11 through 17. When you get into the lower gears, 19 through 27 or 28 or 34 or whatever, there's a much bigger jump between gears, which makes for more difficult shifting under load. Wouldn't it make sense to have closer gears for the situations in which it's more difficult to shift, and spread the gears out more for the range in which it's easier to shift?

    Or is that logical only to my own wacky, hill-challenged mind?
    "How about if we all just try to follow these very simple rules of the road? Drive like the person ahead on the bike is your son/daughter. Ride like the cars are ambulances carrying your loved ones to the emergency room. This should cover everything, unless you are a complete sociopath."
    David Desautels, in a letter to velonews.com

    Random babblings and some stuff to look at.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    463
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalidurga View Post
    Here's what I don't get about the way cog sets are put together:

    There's a small differential between the higher gears, say 11 through 17. When you get into the lower gears, 19 through 27 or 28 or 34 or whatever, there's a much bigger jump between gears, which makes for more difficult shifting under load. Wouldn't it make sense to have closer gears for the situations in which it's more difficult to shift, and spread the gears out more for the range in which it's easier to shift?

    Or is that logical only to my own wacky, hill-challenged mind?
    That's a good point. I'm considering the 11-34 IRD cassette that SadieKate mentioned. 11-13-15-17-19-21-23-25-28-34. That's a big jump into the spinner gear. I haven't tried it "in person" yet.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by dachshund View Post
    That's a good point. I'm considering the 11-34 IRD cassette that SadieKate mentioned. 11-13-15-17-19-21-23-25-28-34. That's a big jump into the spinner gear. I haven't tried it "in person" yet.
    If you currently have a 'road' rear derailleur, you'll need to get a mountain rear derailleur to use that cassette.

    Shimano road derailleurs--even if they are the long cage for a triple up front--only can handle 27 teeth max, so that's why the biggest road cassettes from Shimano go to 27. SRAM goes to 28. Now, as far as your wheel hub goes, Shimano and SRAM are interchangeable (not true of Campy). And I have heard that a Shimano RD can be pushed to 28.

    For more teeth, like a cassette with 32 or 34 teeth, you must use a mountain derailleur. As far as shifting under load, one thing you can do is get a 'low-normal' RD. This will make the moving to easier gears (bigger cogs) easier, but it will change your right STI (controls the rear) to a configuration opposite of a road or top normal mtn derailleur.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Md suburbs of Wash. DC
    Posts
    2,131
    Quote Originally Posted by ilima View Post
    As far as shifting under load, one thing you can do is get a 'low-normal' RD. This will make the moving to easier gears (bigger cogs) easier, but it will change your right STI (controls the rear) to a configuration opposite of a road or top normal mtn derailleur.
    Can you clarify what you mean by "it will change your right STI (controls the rear) to a configuration opposite of a road or top normal mtn derailleur"? "Low normal" and "top normal" are terms I don't think I've heard before.

    Thanks
    "How about if we all just try to follow these very simple rules of the road? Drive like the person ahead on the bike is your son/daughter. Ride like the cars are ambulances carrying your loved ones to the emergency room. This should cover everything, unless you are a complete sociopath."
    David Desautels, in a letter to velonews.com

    Random babblings and some stuff to look at.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    463
    Quote Originally Posted by ilima View Post
    If you currently have a 'road' rear derailleur, you'll need to get a mountain rear derailleur to use that cassette.

    Shimano road derailleurs--even if they are the long cage for a triple up front--only can handle 27 teeth max, so that's why the biggest road cassettes from Shimano go to 27. SRAM goes to 28. Now, as far as your wheel hub goes, Shimano and SRAM are interchangeable (not true of Campy). And I have heard that a Shimano RD can be pushed to 28.

    For more teeth, like a cassette with 32 or 34 teeth, you must use a mountain derailleur. As far as shifting under load, one thing you can do is get a 'low-normal' RD. This will make the moving to easier gears (bigger cogs) easier, but it will change your right STI (controls the rear) to a configuration opposite of a road or top normal mtn derailleur.
    The IRD 11-34 is also supposed to work with a Campy compact 34-50 and a medium cage derailleur.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •