
Originally Posted by
DebW
My "industry sources" say the opposite. Even fairly cheap rear derailleurs shifts well because the shifter acts on the unloaded side of the chain. A drivetrain would operate better with a lesser quality RD and a higher quality FD (and crankset). Bikes aren't sold that way due to marketing considerations - the RD catches people's eye and it's model number becomes associated with the whole drivetrain. So put a 105 RD on a bike with otherwise cheaper components and it sells better at a given price point.
Nevertheless, some words of advice for carriesn. Put your bike in it's lowest gear (inside rear cog, smallest chainring) and observe the gap between the chain and the inside of the front derailleur plate. It should be only 0.5 mm on a 10-speed system, up to 1 mm on a 9-speed system. If it's greater than that, take it back to your LBS for a better adjustment. Also, observe the angle of the outer plate on the derailleur. It should be parallel to the chainrings (comparing to the largest chainring is easiest). In terms of usage, keep track on what rear cog the chain was on when a FD shift results in a dropped chain. If it's only certain cogs, you could learn to avoid a FD shift in those cogs (not ideal and not foolproof, but may save some headaches). It could be that upgrading to Ultegra would make you very happy.
Interesting...thank you for sharing that. I'm long thought that the RD was the better thing to upgrade in terms of performance. I'm curious as to why and when the RD became the "defining" feauture of the drivetrain.
Live with intention. Walk to the edge. Listen hard. Practice wellness. Play with abandon. Laugh. Choose with no regret. Continue to learn. Appreciate your friends. Do what you love. Live as if this is all there is.
--Mary Anne Radmacher