Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    3,997
    You might need to experiment
    Having ridden 170 cranks on my race bikes, I have recently gone to 175 cranks on my time trial bike because of the type of riding I do on it. (I have 172.5 on my NEW road race bike)

    I have heard some espouse the theory that shorter cranks can be a useful option instead on longer...

    So, to sum that up... I have nothing useful to say to give you solid direction
    Last edited by RoadRaven; 05-29-2008 at 11:05 AM. Reason: Cause I have a new race bike as of this week and had to change the numbers...


    Courage does not always roar. Sometimes, it is the quiet voice at the end of the day saying,
    "I will try again tomorrow".


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vernon, British Columbia
    Posts
    2,226
    Hey, CC

    If it helps at all to know - Bif, the Torrent you rode while you were here, has 170 cranks, while Portia, the Santa Cruz you tried briefly, has 165 cranks. Of course there are a lot of other differences between my two mtb's and more still compared to yours, but maybe you could tell the difference in the crank length??

    I prefer the 165's. But I'm really short.

    Hugs and butterflies,
    ~T~
    The butterflies are within you.

    My photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/picsiechick/

    Buy my photos: http://www.picsiechick.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kelowna, BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,737
    I have 165's on my old bike and I'm getting them on my new bike too. And I'm a tad taller than you.
    It is never too late to be what you might have been. ~ George Elliot


    My podcast about being a rookie triathlete:Kelownagurl Tris Podcast

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    5,316

    hmm

    RR-you're too funny..

    T-The only thing i remember about the Santa Cruz was it felt a bit cramped but i was on it for just a v short time @ the top of the lake. Bif felt fine & got me through the panic of getting accross the road and up the hills...

    I'll visit a bike shop on the weekend & have a gander with them..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    3,997
    *Rave takes a bow to only member in audience of 1 at the Comedy Show*

    Thanks CC - I try... maybe tooooo hard

    CC... forgot to mention, in case u forgot, I'm 5'10"

    Just to add more detail to my not-very-helpful info...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    5,316

    hmmm

    RR..i'm sending you an air slap at the moment

    Hopefully when we venture to NZ @ christmas we might have a slim chance of catching up. That way i can thwack ya!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    98
    This presentation by Jim Martin suggests to me that crank length doesn't significantly affect power output:

    http://www.serottacyclinginstitute.c...gTechnique.pdf

    So I choose crank length for other reasons, like knee health, pedal clearance and a balanced feel.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •