Blue, Bianchi, Redline...best value? Help me decide!

[mimitabby]

Bianchi holds its value. If you ever want to upgrade or just sell that bike, you will be better off with the Bianchi, all other things being equal. I bought one off Ebay for $700 (older model) and sold it more than a year later for $650 to a nice kid.

[VeloVT]

Hmmm... lots of information there...

--I'd stay away from the Conquest (the lower-end used one). That frame is going to be heavier and less stiff. I actually rode a low-end conquest that was quite sluggish feeling. Also I believe those Tektro brakes are not as good as the Avids.

--Generally, I'd want to stay at least at 105, especially for the front derailleur (why is it that they always put higher quality rear der's on, when it makes much more difference in front?).

--I wouldn't get hung up about small things like seatposts and handlebars; not only do these not cost much to change, but you may end up needing something different than what comes stock anyway. Carbon seatposts sort of fall into the "bling" category -- and I'm not sure I'd go out of my way to have one for cross anyway.

--One thing I would look at is gear ratios. While you certainly can swap out cranks and cassettes, it can get a little pricey and you'd want to figure that into the final cost. I would definitely compare the gear ranges and try to figure out what you want. That Axis has an LX rear der -- does it have a big huge cassette in back? Are the compact cranks standard road compacts (50/34) or something more like 46/36? Etc...

--That Cross Concept looks pretty sweet ...I'd be tempted. Blue looks nice also, and the Conquest Pro seems fine too. They downgraded the components on the Axis to Tiagra (my 2005 Axis has 105), and that would be a negative for me.

--I guess other than this, I would take each of them for a nice long test ride if you can (at least 30 min). Each one will have different ride characteristics, and you will have preferences. This is probably as important as the other stuff.

Good luck! Glad you were able to find some bikes that fit.

[celerystalksme]

Hmmm... lots of information there...

--I'd stay away from the Conquest (the lower-end used one). That frame is going to be heavier and less stiff. I actually rode a low-end conquest that was quite sluggish feeling. Also I believe those Tektro brakes are not as good as the Avids.

--Generally, I'd want to stay at least at 105, especially for the front derailleur (why is it that they always put higher quality rear der's on, when it makes much more difference in front?).

--I wouldn't get hung up about small things like seatposts and handlebars; not only do these not cost much to change, but you may end up needing something different than what comes stock anyway. Carbon seatposts sort of fall into the "bling" category -- and I'm not sure I'd go out of my way to have one for cross anyway.

--One thing I would look at is gear ratios. While you certainly can swap out cranks and cassettes, it can get a little pricey and you'd want to figure that into the final cost. I would definitely compare the gear ranges and try to figure out what you want. That Axis has an LX rear der -- does it have a big huge cassette in back? Are the compact cranks standard road compacts (50/34) or something more like 46/36? Etc...

--That Cross Concept looks pretty sweet ...I'd be tempted. Blue looks nice also, and the Conquest Pro seems fine too. They downgraded the components on the Axis to Tiagra (my 2005 Axis has 105), and that would be a negative for me.

--I guess other than this, I would take each of them for a nice long test ride if you can (at least 30 min). Each one will have different ride characteristics, and you will have preferences. This is probably as important as the other stuff.

Good luck! Glad you were able to find some bikes that fit.

gearing...

blue cx6.5: 46/36 crank, 12-27 cassette
redline conquest: 46/36 crank, 12-25 cassette
redline conquest pro: 46/36 crank, 12-27 cassette
bianchi axis: 50/36 crank, 11-32 cassette
bianchi cross concept: 46/36 crank, 12-25 cassette

what is the most preferable to cross racing?

[VeloVT]

I'm not the most qualified person to answer that question (I'm sort of in the same position you are, want to try cross racing this fall for the first time, but I already have the bike).

You might find this thread interesting though. I asked for input on gearing and got some useful feedback from women who race:

http://forums.teamestrogen.com/showthread.php?t=22429

.

[celerystalksme]

i'm leaning towards the blue...i can now get it for $900. but...does anyone know if i could get the bianchi cross concept as frame and fork only?

[SheFly]

Given what you have posted, I think the Blue is the best value for your money. You need to think about the components of a 'cross bike almost as much (if not more) than the frame. The components on the Blue are fairly good, and the wheelset is actually quite good for that price. I run Ksyriums on both of my race bikes for 'cross, and really like them.

The steel Bianchis are going to be much heavier. You might not notice this as you just get into racing, but I have done everything that I can to get my 'cross bike as light as possible - not only for riding, but for when I have to carry it.

For gearing, I run a single 42 chainring in the front, with an MTB cassette in the rear. This gearing has worked well for me in New England races. I do run a double on my pit bike, but I use that more for riding around town...

Again, from my perspective, the best value seems to be the Blue. Good luck whatever you decide.

SheFly

[VeloVT]

Shefly is probably right about the Blue -- but just to clarify, neither Bianchi is steel. Bianchi does (did?) make a cross-inspired steel bike, the Volpe, that was kind of set up for touring (and the one I test rode was really heavy!) -- but both of these are aluminum bikes with carbon forks.