Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: crank length

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,414
    It's amazing how you can really feel a few mm difference. I'm 5'6", 31.5" inseam. I have a bike with 170s and a bike with 172.5s, and I can tell the difference. I prefer the 172.5's because I get better leverage -- it's noticeable all of the time but particularly on hills. I suppose it's a tad easier to spin faster on the shorter cranks, but the 172.5's allow me to spin as fast as I need to (normal cadence on 172.5's is around 90-100; when I get really tired at the end of a windy ride, I might ride in lower gears and spin between 100-110).

    When bike shopping I often feel lucky (perhaps even grateful) that I'm very average sized (that is, I'm not petite). I am on the small end of the range where it's reasonably easy to find components to fit (and it drives me nuts how few models of bars come in 38cm, and that my size XS, WSD bike came stock with 40s), but I think it's still much easier for me than for many smaller women.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    3,063
    I don't feel any real difference between 170's and 172.5's on my two road bikes but I had to switch out the 175's from my commuter bike as I was getting knee pain.
    I'd rather be swimming...biking...running...and eating cheesecake...
    --===--

    2008 Cervelo P2C Tri bike
    2011 Trek Madone 5.5/Cobb V-Flow Max
    2007 Jamis Coda/Terry Liberator
    2011 Trek Mamba 29er

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    979
    sometimes I'm just surprised at the difference 2.5 mm will make

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    52
    At 5'4", I have a 30" inseam and wear petite slacks. But because I have long femurs (not uncommon for women) I ride a 170 crank very comfortably.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,131
    5' 1 3/4" w/26" standover, the builders for my custom Rodriguez reccomended 170m cranks for me. Besides taking the standard standover measurement, the LBS guys took another measurement with me kneeling to get my femur-to-tibia ratio. Turns out my femurs are way longer than my tibia. Who knew? I think shoe size went into consideration too. My knees are definitely happier now than when I had 165m cranks. Just so you know my current bike's geometry is way different than the bike I had with the 165m cranks on them, so that may make a difference too.
    Everything in moderation, including moderation.

    2007 Rodriguez Adventure/B72
    2009 Masi Soulville Mixte/B18
    1997 Trek 820 Step-thru Xtracycle/B17

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Uncanny Valley
    Posts
    14,498
    Good point. Short femurs here.
    Speed comes from what you put behind you. - Judi Ketteler

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    979
    how can you tell with the ratio of femur: tibia which crank you need? I've never heard about that and would like to hear more

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •