Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 29

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Denver Metro
    Posts
    834
    Almost 5'6 and I ride a 49cm bike, just about the exact same measurements as you.
    I was originally put on a 50 or 51, don't remember-whatever a small giant is. And I rode 2 of them for a little over a year, I constantly had shoulder issues because I was to stretched out. The next bike I went to(the litespeed) I went down to the 49 and ever since then there is no turning back! I have continously been told by shops, when they look at me, that there is no way I would fit on a 49, but once they see me on it they say it is perfect.(i just have a big drop between saddle and handle bars, which I prefer- but I'm not stretched out).

    Sounds like we are similar:-)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    North Cascades
    Posts
    72
    My Bianchi C2C is a 50cm w/ 52.5 top tube c-c, stem 80mm/10deg rise
    I am 5'7" with a 32" inseam... short body, long legs.
    I have a friend who is my same height and rides a 54cm Trek. (opposite of me long body, short legs) Treks usually have long top tubes. I can hardly reach the bars on her bike, but the stand over is fine.

    It's all about comfort. Most women on average have long thigh bones, shorter frames give you more leverage... or so I've been told.
    Sally
    LIVE, PLAY, EAT, SLEEP, REPEAT

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    28
    I'm on a "S" sloper with a 51ST, 52.5TT with a 110stem.

    I'm 5'6" with a 32 inseam.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •