Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: 29'ers

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    foothills of the Ozarks aka Tornado Alley
    Posts
    4,193
    I guess I like bouncing and getting jarred.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Looking at all the love there that's sleeping
    Posts
    4,171
    Seems like all the cool kids these days ride 29'ers.
    And if you're REALLY cool, you ride a rigid, singlespeed 29'er.
    I've heard - but have not first hand knowledge - that the steering/handling is more sluggish on a 29'er.
    I'd love to try a REALLY cool bike...but my LBS says "Try it first. You may not like it." So if they're lending, I'll be trying. But I guess I won't be buyin' before ridin'.
    2007 Seven ID8 - Bontrager InForm
    2003 Klein Palomino - Terry Firefly (?)
    2010 Seven Cafe Racer - Bontrager InForm
    2008 Cervelo P2C - Adamo Prologue Saddle

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407
    This point might be up for debate, but I'm of the opinion that there is zero advantage to riding a 29er for people who are shorter like me (5'3"). And I've seen some short women on these bikes and they look ridiculous; their bikes do not fit them.

    Toe overlap on a mountain bike....forget that. I don't even have toe overlap on my CX bike....

    People could easily cushion up their hardtails with a set of tubeless tires and run some lower tire pressure.

    I'm lucky, I live in WI. We have the similar types of terrain as people in Colorado do, but we don't have the sustained climbing. So there is not much advantage of racing with a hardtail over a full. So no 29ers or HT's for me!
    Just keep pedaling.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    foothills of the Ozarks aka Tornado Alley
    Posts
    4,193
    Quote Originally Posted by madisongrrl View Post
    This point might be up for debate, but I'm of the opinion that there is zero advantage to riding a 29er for people who are shorter like me (5'3").
    I've heard the same from my LBS. I think Gary Fisher designed the forks on the 29'ers so that there wouldn't be any toe overlap. Specialized is slowly introducing 29'er and I'll be interested to read the reviews.

    Right now I'm thinking about the practical side of a 29'er. Tubes may be hard to come by in a pinch, as well as rims. It may take me longer to cover the same amount of distance, but at least I'll be more nimble on turns.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by sundial View Post
    I've heard the same from my LBS. I think Gary Fisher designed the forks on the 29'ers so that there wouldn't be any toe overlap. Specialized is slowly introducing 29'er and I'll be interested to read the reviews.
    The room for standover height and wheels decreases as the size of the 29er frame decreases. Sometimes when frame builders make corrections for toe overlap on these smaller sized frames, it comes at the compromise of something else. This can result in the bike handling completely different or squirrelly even.

    I'm still not sold on the 29er concept for short people, but I'd certainly be interested in testing a few of these bikes off-road.
    Just keep pedaling.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Traveling Nomad
    Posts
    6,763
    Lessee, I ride a Bike Friday with 20" wheels, a road bike with 650c wheels, and a mountain bike with 26" wheels. I am 5' 1-1/2". I simply can't imagine how I would begin to fit on a bike with 29" wheels without looking and feeling ridiculous, not to mention having major handling issues. Fortunately, I have no need to replace my MTB, so it's a non-issue, just one that makes me say ...huhhhhh?

    I would love to see a photo of a gal my size riding one!

    Emily
    Emily

    2011 Jamis Dakar XC "Toto" - Selle Italia Ldy Gel Flow
    2007 Trek Pilot 5.0 WSD "Gloria" - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow
    2004 Bike Friday Petite Pocket Crusoe - Selle Italia Diva Gel Flow

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    66
    I've never thought of myself as tall, but based on the responses here I must be a giant. I'm 5'4", and I absolutely adore my 29er.

    My standover clearance is the same (more actually) than my last 26" MTB, and the overall fit is better too. Of course that just points to a poor fit on my first bike, and isn't a statement on 26" bikes in general. But at 5'4" I was able to comfortably fit on, and test-ride, several 29ers. I think 5'3" / 5'4" is about the limit though to comfortably fit on a 29er.

    From the moment I got on my 29er I felt more comfortable and confident. I love the way it handles, and I saw an immediate gain in my riding. In fact I didn't really start riding consistently until I got my Niner. Now I'm so in love with it I ride 3 - 4 days a week.

    I do have one criticism though. It's mostly me, really, but due to my lack of strength (I'm still building my base) and a bad knee the gearing was too high. The crankset on a 29er is the same as on your 26" bike, but the wheels are bigger. So effectively your gearing is higher, and I lost my really low gears for the long steep climbs. We tried replacing the small 22 tooth ring with a smaller 20 tooth ring, but kept having problems with the chain. Turned out the chain was hitting the part of the crank that houses the bolts. We were able to fix it by shaving down those knobs, so I've got all the gears I want, but if you're a slow climber like me it's a consideration.
    I don't crash so much anymore (less blood on the trail), so just call me Stephanie

    I'll tell you what I think of bicycling. I think it has done more to emancipate women than any one thing in the world. I rejoice every time I see a woman ride by on a bike. It gives her a feeling of self-reliance and independence the moment she takes her seat; and away she goes, the picture of untrammelled womanhood. ~ Susan B. Anthony

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Toltec, Arkansaw
    Posts
    512
    Quote Originally Posted by emily_in_nc View Post

    I would love to see a photo of a gal my size riding one!

    Emily


    If your bike doesn't fit you (frame size, saddle height, reach, etc., it's not going to be comfortable, and you're not going to like it very much.

    I'm not one of the cool kids, but I do have both a Fisher 29er and a 26" Specialized hardtail, and I much prefer the 29er. I'm not a real technical MTB rider -- mostly cross country, and I can go places and cross obstacles and seemingly bottomless pits with my 29er where the 26" would have me dead in a ditch somewheres. As Emily notes, if the frame fits you, it doesn't matter much how big the wheels are.

    That being said, the 29er wheels take a little more motor, or oomph to get them rolling, but once you do it's not a lot of extra effort to keep your momentum. And I like the ability to pretty much float over most anything that gets in my way.

    Depending on your riding style, you'll probably like it if you try the big wheels. I know I wish I'd listened to Odell over at the bike shop when he tried to guide me over to the 29er rack when I first took up MTBing....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maynard, MA
    Posts
    145
    Some of my fellow chicks here got 29ers last year. They really seem to love them. They like the less-bumpy feel and they say the roll over the rocks and roots (mostly what we ride on in these parts) with less effort. These gals are on the medium to short side, and they seem handle the bikes well.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    You guys should read the FAQs in that link I provided. It specifically addresses problems for short folk. I've yet to see a 29'er that I didn't think would create other problems while only offering one benefit.
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    foothills of the Ozarks aka Tornado Alley
    Posts
    4,193
    Quote Originally Posted by SadieKate View Post
    You guys should read the FAQs in that link I provided. It specifically addresses problems for short folk. I've yet to see a 29'er that I didn't think would create other problems while only offering one benefit.
    OK, just for reference here's the pros and cons as listed on www.ninerbikes.com

    What are the pros and cons of a 29” wheel?

    The 29” wheel has many pros and not as many cons. Most of the cons of the 29” wheel are misconceptions or can be addressed with proper geometry and wheel/tire choice. The Pros are as follows: 1. More stability. 29” wheels have more gyroscopic effect than their 26” wheeled little brothers, keeping the bike stable at speeds. In addition, the rider on a 29” wheel bike has a lower center of gravity in relationship to the wheel’s axle. The lower the center of gravity, the more stable the platform becomes. Think of it as riding “in” the bike, instead of on top of the bike. 2. Better grip. The contact patch of the 29” wheel is larger and therefore puts more of the tread on the ground which increases traction. This combined with the added stability of the gyroscopic effect means that you can lean into a corner and just hold on for the ride. As you learn to trust the Niner in the corners, you’ll be amazed at how far over the bike can lean and maintain traction. Let off those brakes and let the Niner take you for an amazing ride. 3. Faster, more controlled descending. The larger the tire, the more the bike will float above the terrain instead of getting stuck down in the terrain. Think of it like a monster truck being able to get up and over the top of cars with those huge honking wheels as apposed to a skateboard wheel that locks up on a small rock (this is an extreme example, obviously). The 29” wheel just doesn’t get caught in the ruts of technical terrain. 4. Added comfort. The 29” wheel allows for more compliance, damping the terrain and adding more comfort to the ride. 5. Better control. Because of all of the above traits, Niner’s simply have more control than their 26” wheel brethren do. The cons are as follows (and addressed as to their validity) 1. Added weight. The larger the wheel, the heavier it will be. This is true to an extent; however it depends on the wheel and tire choice used. Many 29” wheels have gotten down in weight and there are some extremely light tires now out on the market. Frame weight difference between a 29” wheel bike and a 26” wheel bike is nominal. 2. Slower acceleration. This is due in part to the above mentioned higher weight in the wheels. Lighter wheels and tires will help this, however, the larger the wheel, the harder it is to get up to speed if looked at scientifically. Many people have noticed this to be true on single speed starts, but they only notice in the first few pedal strokes. Once up to speed, the 29” wheel maintains its momentum much better than a 26” wheel. On a geared bike, the difference is imperceptible. 3. Slower handling. This is a misconception. Many of the early generation 29” wheel mountain bikes just adopted the standard 26” wheel geometry and made it longer to fit the 29” wheel, causing excessive wheelbase length, slack head tubes with bad fork trail, and high bottom bracket heights. Niner bikes geometry is designed around the 29” wheel and is every bit as agile as a 26” wheel bike. Tight switchbacks and technical terrain are no problem on a Niner.
    And another question about short(er) riders:

    Are 29” wheels just for tall people?

    Quite simply, no. They definitely make a larger bike look more correctly proportioned to the rider, but many people under average height ride 29ers and are totally stoked with the ride. Chris Sugai, co-founder of Niner bikes is 5’ 6” and his enthusiasm for the bigger wheels is contagious. The benefits that apply to the larger wheel are noticeable no matter what your height. That being said, riders under 5’ 4” are likely to find fitting a 29er a little more difficult. As the frame gets smaller, there are other issues that the larger wheel will bring up such as toe overlap to the front wheel and standover height. Standover height can easily be addressed with bent top tubes and other means, but the top tube length can only get so short before your toe starts hitting the front wheel while turning.
    SadieKate, will we see you on a Niner?
    Last edited by sundial; 03-05-2008 at 07:21 AM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bendemonium
    Posts
    9,673
    You're saying that facetiously, right?

    -- signed Short and Stumpy
    Frends know gud humors when dey is hear it. ~ Da Crockydiles of ZZE.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •