Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Between the Blue Ridge and the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    5,203
    Friction shifters are more easily fixed than integrated shifters. Downtube shifters are an easily-repairable option, too, but I don't like to drop my hand down to shift. I did it all the time (I didn't get a bike with integrated shifters until 2004), but for me, I like to keep both hands on the bars.

    Sidepulls get out of whack. I like cantilevers, some folks like centerpulls.

    The main things to remember is to get a bike that fits properly and to keep it simple. Steel is more comfortable than aluminum, in my opinion. I like the LHT and the classic Trek 520. They have what's needed, and not much that's not needed. I've heard good things about the Jamis Aurora, but I haven't checked it out in person.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2

    Thanks everyone

    Thank you to everyone, it was all helpful. I'm taking my time to bring it all together and I always have my Terry! Ride on.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm the only one allowed to whine
    Posts
    10,557
    Side note about friction/index barcons: I messed up my rear shifter and things got stinky with the indexing. Flipped the selector to "friction" and was able to ride happily for another month until I could get into my LBS.

    Luuuuuuv my bar-end shifters.
    "If Americans want to live the American Dream, they should go to Denmark." - Richard Wilkinson

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    2,024
    I really second the rec to try touring on your symetry. In fact, my touring bike is an older steel isis (same geometry as your symetry) that I had s/s couplers installed on, and added cantilever brakes to use 32mm tires. However, the symetry as spec'd will accept 28mm wide tires, which is plenty for many touring applications, and a rear rack. So, why don't you try that, see if it limits you, and if so then consider another bike. The geometry on the older symetry/isis is not that different from the older classic/madeleine (tourers). The biggest diff. is the tourers accept wider tires and fenders and a front rack, and came stock with larger rear cogsets but you can easily put a mountain cogset and der. on your symetry if you need it (I did do this on my isis).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    270

    Barends

    I also love my barends I have them on two of my bikes.I like the simplisty and the way they look on the handlebars. Yeah barends!!!!!!

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •