Tuck, I totally get why you want your DH safely away from motorcycles. (If you really can't talk him out of it, insist that he take the Motorcycle Safety Foundation class before he ever gets on a bike of his own, and the Reg Pridmore CLASS school in his first year. If/when he gets his first bike, it should be a SMALL one; but truthfully COG is more of an issue for us inseam-challenged types than it is for people who can flatfoot, and in any case it's really only an issue at all at very low speed.)
But back to topic: in my experience, "cager" is a term used by real motorcyclists much more than bikers. (If you don't understand the distinction, that's a whole 'nother thread...) Maybe it's some kind of "biker" thing to think that one is a "biker" whether or not one actually owns a motorcycle, and therefore someone must also be a "cager" whether or not they're actually driving the car. But I've never heard the term used that way. "Cager" is derogatory, yes, but I don't think the term applies to anyone who's not TWO. Just somebody who happens to be in a cage at the time.
DH and I sometimes talk about taking the cage, ourselves. It is one, after all. I don't think it has anything to do with their driving abilities or anything. Just their choice to cut themselves off from sensory input and physical control of their vehicles.



Reply With Quote
(but not while driving despite the proximity of drive-thru Daiquiri shops)


