Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.

To disable ads, please log-in.

Shop at TeamEstrogen.com for women's cycling apparel.

Results 1 to 15 of 105

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Blessed to be all over the place!
    Posts
    3,433
    I've not been able to read all posts as this thread took off, but I do have one question:

    I see the phrase "Thanks Ladies" on this forum alot. Does anyone receive this offensively?

    It is a sincere question from a man who typically refers to women as "women" not ladies...but the phrase "Thanks Ladies" seems to be a form of slang that doesn't seem offensive and seems appropriate in the right context.
    If you don't grow where you're planted, you'll never BLOOM - Will Rogers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Kent, Washington state
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Silver View Post
    I've not been able to read all posts as this thread took off, but I do have one question:

    I see the phrase "Thanks Ladies" on this forum alot. Does anyone receive this offensively?

    It is a sincere question from a man who typically refers to women as "women" not ladies...but the phrase "Thanks Ladies" seems to be a form of slang that doesn't seem offensive and seems appropriate in the right context.
    The collective noun of "Ladies" is much less offensive than 'Girls', 'Babes', 'Chicks', etc.

    It's also more polite than 'Thanks, Gals', which would be the 'Thanks, Guys' equivalent (because the equivalent of 'Thanks Ladies = Thanks Gentlemen).

    East Hill

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Limbo
    Posts
    8,769
    Quote Originally Posted by East Hill View Post
    The collective noun of "Ladies" is much less offensive than 'Girls', 'Babes', 'Chicks', etc.
    The collective noun of 'ladies' seems more suited to those women with whom you are acquainted. perhaps a smaller group as well.
    Not at all offensive when used in a formal sense.
    2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
    2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
    2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    4,066
    Actually, reconsidering I see there's nothing at all wrong with the terms "ladies" or "girls" or whatever, it's just that sometimes people use them in strange settings. Let's see if I can doodle this out.

    Women are often referred to as, well, women, rather than just *people*. Example: yesterdays paper had a headline that went "women start up internet business" (or something of the sort). The article was not about women in general tending to start up net businesses, but about two specific women who had quit their jobs and done so. The headline would never have read "Men start up net business". Men are default, women are pointed out as different.

    Especially in a professional setting, making a point out of somebody being a woman is just unnecessary. And can easily make her feel like an outsider. Calling a woman a lady or a girl or whatever might be appropriate, depending on the setting, but a lot of the time it's just unnecessary. It both points out that hey, everybody, this is a woman! and gives her certain characteristics. If that's what you *mean* to say, by all means do so.

    On this forum we're obviously all women (give or take so thanking the "girls" or "ladies" isn't strange. And "thanks, women" just sounds strange. On an all-men forum I might say "thanks, gentlemen!". Though I probably would stick to "thanks, everybody".
    Winter riding is much less about badassery and much more about bundle-uppery. - malkin

    1995 Kona Cinder Cone commuterFrankenbike/Selle Italia SLR Lady Gel Flow
    2008 white Nakamura Summit Custom mtb/Terry Falcon X
    2000 Schwinn Fastback Comp road bike/Specialized Jett

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •