
Originally Posted by
Starfish
I totally believe you. Actually, I didn't mean doing it with little training. I meant training pretty long and hard...but for endurance, rather than any speed. I used to be a competitive swimmer, so I believe I could do that distance with proper training and OWS coaching. I know I can do the bike distance. I'm guessing I could walk the whole way (not happily, not without pain, probably not without injury). I don't mean this is a foregone conclusion...just that I think I could endurance train enough to somehow struggle through the distance, if everything went just right, someday.
But, all this to make my point: once you add in the time limit...Oh My Gosh...I am not at all sure I could EVER do it, despite the right training program. So, I definitely agree with you...the time limit MEANS SOMETHING!
Well, I'll all about the endurance and not speed. I have come to the realization that I'll never be fast on the bike and run. Fine. Then I need to be consistent and even and keep going. I can do that.
The time limit does mean something and it should mean becoming and Ironman or not... and the difference between getting a finishers medal or not. We aren't in Pre-K, everyone doesn't need a medal to feel good about themselves.
I realized this morning that some people race an IM to reach a certain time goal... I will be racing against the clock... counting down every minute to ensure that I make it in under 17 hours. Everytime I stop moving is more more minute I add to not finishing. So, even though I won't be placing in my AG, I have to keep moving no matter what.
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather, to skid in broadside thoroughly used-up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: WOW WHAT A RIDE!!!!"