Bike computers

[wiseowl]

I have a wireless computer that I just put on the bike on Friday. I love it, works great, but I have never had a wired one to compare to. The install for a wired one did look harder (the manual had instructions for both), and I (finally) have bike pride for my pretty new bike, so it is nice not to have the wires running about the frame. The only problem, from my perspective, is that I can't really use it on the trainer indoors in the winter (the sensor and computer need to be 23-27 inches from each other), but I will go more on time then, anyway. The computer is a BIG help to me to see how I am doing-I am new enough to biking that I am pitiful at estimating time and speed. And I will poke along slower without the computer than with it- I just know that about myself. But I can see how, if I was fairly expert or was feeling pressured for performance, riding without it could be liberating and help restore some joy. But since they aren't cake to take on and off, I think I will stick with mine (plus, i am far from expert). I strongly recommed computers to newbies like myself, even if you think it makes you seem to "serious"!

[Look]

I agree with wiseowl. It's great for a less experienced rider.
I LOVE data. I play games with myself. Like when I'm tiring at the end, I work to keep my speed at or above my avg speed so I don't lose anything. I would drift if I didn't have the feedback. Also the cadence monitor has been just awesome for pacing myself and getting a feel for pedaling into wind or up hills.
In the gym I'm very dependent on my HRM, so I thought I'd use that on the bike, but top speed/ avg speed and cadence are just more useful in practice. Although on the infrequent occasions when I do wear the hrm on my bike, I have noticed that I feel way better at higher bpm's than I used to and can sustain them longer.

I didn't step up to the altimeter, and I'm curious if others find that valuable. We are so rolling here, it might be useful comparison. Or it may just be confusing.

Finally, when I ride with newer riders who don't have a computer, I find I can encourage them with the numbers, "hey you sustained 20 mph that whole stretch!" If they don't get preoccupied with the less encouraging stats, I can pat them on the back with more encouraging ones! So maybe the solution is, ride with a buddy who has a cycle computer and tell them to only give you good news!

[lauraelmore1033]

I had a wireless computer once, and didn't like it because it could pick up signals from pretty much everywhere--like from other wireless computers (unless they're coded). I've also noticed that when I use a head light too close to the computer it will interfere with the reading, whether it is wireless or not. I think an odometer is a must (or keeping track of the miles) since there are many mileage related maintenence issues which become expensive it not delt with in a timely fashion (like changing the chain at 1000 miles a chore which, if ignored, can bring about the need to replace expensive parts of one's drive train. Don't ask me how I know ...)