Hills don't kill people. Mountains do.
A rise is anything too small to be a hill.
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: What is the difference...
Hybrid View
-
06-24-2007, 01:57 PM #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 317
-
06-24-2007, 07:56 PM #2
Ride your ride.
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Md suburbs of Wash. DC
- Posts
- 2,131
If it makes you hurt, then it doesn't matter how you designate it
"How about if we all just try to follow these very simple rules of the road? Drive like the person ahead on the bike is your son/daughter. Ride like the cars are ambulances carrying your loved ones to the emergency room. This should cover everything, unless you are a complete sociopath."
David Desautels, in a letter to velonews.com
Random babblings and some stuff to look at.
-
06-24-2007, 08:03 PM #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Posts
- 2,024
Hill climbs are of relatively short duration vs mountain climbs. While the grades encountered can be similar, mountain climbs just seem to go on forever.
-
06-24-2007, 08:27 PM #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Sonoma County, CA
- Posts
- 658
My personal definition is the presence of switch backs. Every mountain climb I've done seems to involve some sort of switch backs, hills don't.
"Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There's something wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym." -- Bill Nye
-
06-24-2007, 10:17 PM #5
zippadee-doo-dah
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Limbo
- Posts
- 8,769
There you go. It's all relative.
Originally Posted by Kalidurga
If it makes you hurt, then it doesn't matter how you designate it
I also think it depends on your locality. There are places here that are officially named mountains but to a westerner they'd be hills.2008 Trek FX 7.2/Terry Cite X
2009 Jamis Aurora/Brooks B-68
2010 Trek FX 7.6 WSD/stock bontrager
Reply With Quote
