Should I do the Metric, or the whole thing?
Some of you have been helping me in the thread: Distance Climbing Question in the Tips/Tricks forum.
A new question. In 1-1/2 weeks, there is a local ride with two options I would consider:
- Metric Century with 3000 feet climbing.
- 112 mile ride with 6500 feet climbing.
I have been planning to do the metric as a training ride toward my larger goal event (Shasta Summit Century) in August.
Right now, my longest ride this year is 50 miles with 3430 feet climbing. Those 3430 feet included two harder grades that come at the end of the whole 112 mile ride coming up. I've been assuming I should do the metric as a training ride. But, now I am wondering if I should just try the whole 112 mile ride and see what happens?
I know the routes. The first 60 miles is easier than the last 52 miles. Am I crazy to consider the whole ride? I don't want to so totally toast myself that I spend 3 weeks recovering instead of training. But, I would love to know I finished the whole thing.
Thanks for any thoughts!
"The best rides are the ones where you bite off much more than you can chew, and live through it." ~ Doug Bradbury