SRAM and CAMPY users give me your feedback

[Batbike]

SRAM: I know nothing about it because I have never used it.

Shimano: have used 105 and Ultegra. Both fine. If keeping witb Shimano I would stay with Ultegra because it is a good groupo. Shimano is very smooth.

CAMPY: I LOVE my Campy. I have a full Campy Chorus drivetrain with a carbon 53/39 crank. I like the hoods -- not the big "ditch" as in Shimano, giving me more confidence and better reach/grip. The shifting is wonderful -- can drop from lowest to highest in one quick shift (great when going down hill after a steep climb!) or go from high gear to low gear, jumping to multiple gears in with just one shift (great when climbing or need to increase cadence real quick). I don't think it is as smooth as Shimano, it is more crisp and quick. As for maintenance, if Campy breaks, you can fix it. Shimano needs to replace. Don't know about Sram. One more thing, when putting the cables on your bike, Shimano is very visible at the front of bike, needing only one groove on your handlebars for one cable to wrap under tape (all else visible). Campy is "hidden", using two grooves on handlebar, but if bar only has one groove you can make it work, wrapping cables under tape and making a cleaner appearance and keeping shifts crisper. Sram needs 2 grooves on handlebars and you have to have a 2 groove handlebar to wrap cables -- 1 groove won't work.

[smilingcat]

Personal preference I think...

people have already pointed out:

1. Shimano isn't really set up to be repaired. It's meant to be replaced when worn out. Campy on the other hand are meant to be repaired.

2. Shimano shifts smoothly so you don't get that positive action you can feel as you would with campy.

If you are not racing I think you can't go wrong with Centaur, Chrous for campy and 105, and Ultegra for Shimano. You pay lot more money for Record, and Dura Ace, you really wont notice the difference from the Centaur/Chrous/105/Ultegra. And that extra 1/2 lb saving isn't worth the cost.

Sram is pretty nice but I too have heard of premature breakdown.

Personally, I'm not fond of Centaur. tad slow in shifting and I prefer a quiet yet positive shift. For a recreational and serious weekend rider, I think its still a really nice group. I like Dura Ace, Record, chrous, and ultegra. 105 is tad slow in shifting for me.

Ultegra rear deraillure will hold up for about 5,000 - 10,000 miles. STI brakeset/shifter also about the same distance. Then its time for a new one. Over the years, I have managed to mangle two ultegra rear deraillure, one ultegra front, one shimano-600 (precursor to ultegra), STI brakeset... Most had a minimum of 5,000 miles. They all went well beyond "time to replace".

Centaur is on my "new" used bike and haven't logged that kind of miles yet so can't say. Record and Dura Ace will hold up a little longer than Ultegra. Again haven't had the luxury to ride them into the ground. Its just my observation from others.

Braking issues. really none that I can think of. They all do the job well. Dura ace has a strong braking action ultegra little less. Centaur brake set is real positive. Maybe tad too sensitive on the rear wheel. It has a tendency to grab and lock up the rear. (maybe its my setup don't know). Chrous and record also work really well. All these brakes work well even when the wheels get wet.

The whole thing comes down to personal choice and how well you can reach the control from the hood or from the drop.

The best advice from me is to see how easily you can reach the control and then decide.

[ridebikeme]

I would AGREE with all of the Campy supporters here. I have been using Campy strictly since 1994, and would not change over to a Shimano bike. AS Kathy mentioned" shifters can be repaired" I actually repaired mine last year for around $15! I've also noticed over the years, that the cassettes tend to last longer as well . I realize Campy may be a bit expensive, but with all of the benefits listed in this forum ... well?

I have four bikes with Campy, and absolutely love the fact that jumping from one bike to another feels pretty much the same.(shifting wise) Chorus is definitely the workhorse of the group, and although a few grams heavier... quite a bit less expensive than Record.( although that's very nice

[indysteel]

Alexis,

I'm not sure I would look at in terms of what within Campy is similar to 105, although I'd say anything Veloce on up is as good as or better than 105. But in saying that, I know that 105 has gotten a lot better over the last few years, so perhaps Centaur is a closer match. Really, though, it may just come down to how much you really want to spend.

I do think you get a fair amount of bang for your buck with Centaur, but I haven't looked closely at Campy's offerings for the last couple years--since I built my last bike with Centaur--to appreciate how it differs from Chorus or Record. I chose Centaur in part because of price and also because it offered an alloy crank, which is what I wanted. In truth, I preferred the hoods of my 2006 Veloce, so while the my 2009 Centaur group is better, I liked the functionality of my older groupset.

For that reason, I would suggest going to your local shops and actually trying the various groups and manufacturers. You may find that your hands simply prefer one or the other. Also, have you factored in changing your wheels/hubs if you switch from Shimano to Campy? If I understand correctly, your Shimano-compatible wheels will generally not work with a Campy drivetrain.

I will say this: a lot of shops just don't like working on Campy anymore. Thankfully, that's not an issue for me because I have my own mechanic, otherwise known as my husband, but when I was relying on shops, I found some degree of resistance. Campy often requires Campy-specific tools, that just aren't cheap. Parts themselves, e.g., cassettes and chains, aren't cheap either, so it can cost a little extra money over the years to run Campy.