Quote Originally Posted by cyclingnewbie
I started out looking at the comfort road and touring bikes, thinking that was the geometry I was interested in. But I've decided I like the feel and handling of the traditional road bike better.

I'm curious as to why you gave up on the comfort road geometry (e.g. Trek Pilot line).

I *hate* to do virtual fittings (I'm a visual artist by training and think there is a visual side--as well as an "art"-- to good bike fit) BUT, it seems that that geometry would suit your needs. You could get a bike in the correct "size" (going off of TT length) AND get the "more upright riding position"...only on YOU (it sounds like you have verrrrry long legs and a verrrry short torso?) it would translate to a fairly "normal" road bike position. Does that make sense?

On traditional road bike handling: as you are finding out, it's pretty stretched out. Look at some pro racers (pick up a copy of Velo News). There is nothing wrong with being stretched out. In fact, if you want to ride fast and/or race it's the only way to be! This position requires good flexibily and core strength. Gender and age are not really barriers. Type "Jeannie Longo" into google images and see what you come up with

Some other thoughts on bike fit: thanks to to popularity of compact frames. longer road seatposts are now available. You can buy a bike according to TT length and get a longer post (just be aware that a longer post also increases your effective TT). Stems are also easy to switch out. Many "big" bikes (like 58, 60 cm) come with fairly long stems. You can easily run a 90-110 mm instead. Just don't let the bike shop talk you into anything shorter than that (see it with women alllll the time) as the handling gets kinda wonky and too many gals end up way way too far over the BB (but that's another story).

You can also go with a stem with a bit of rise...but then that brings us back to "what's so wrong with the Pilot?"

And if all else fails...there is always custom. Bring your CC