Opposite Extremes; Same Conclusion
I agree...it is well put.
Wow...it's interesting the contrasts here:
On one hand, women are degraded for too much covering...but then I've observed the more traditional American view (originating - I think - from the feminist movement) that woman were 'objectified' from the opposite extreme of too little (or no) covering.
I'm not advocating either extreme as being right or wrong...it's simply interesting that the opposite extremes can bring one to the same conclusion...
But, to me, I suppose it boils down to consent and choice...does the person have the benefit of choice, within cultural customs and laws, to be unique without fear or persecution.
Everything is permissible, not everything is beneficial. Everything is permissible, not everything is constructive.
This is much more interesting to ponder than I would have ever imagined
If you don't grow where you're planted, you'll never BLOOM - Will Rogers