2006 Cannondale R800

[KnottedYet]

If you need to stretch your budget you could hold off on the aerobars and clipless pedals and shoes for a while. Especially if you are new to riding. I saw very few aerobars in my tri (I don't use them, either), so you could even hold of on the aeros through a few tris!

In the long run you might be happier spending a bit more on the perfect bike now and getting accessories later, rather than spending less on a not-so-perfect bike and getting pedals and aerobars at the same time.

Budgeting is such a pain.... when can I win the lottery?

[kan]

And I hadn't even considered that option. Sometimes you get a little gear happy, you know? And the fit of the Specialized Ruby was so nice. It felt like home somehow... and I know that sounds silly!

So now I'm leaning toward that option, which brings up another question - I've heard some people say that you have to be really, really careful with carbon because the frame integrity is easily compromised. Is this true? Because I have 3 kids and they aren't always as careful around things as I'd like them to be. And I don't know if I want to have a bike that I have to handle with kid gloves all the time. I take care of my things, but I don't want to freak out if it gets knocked over, KWIM? And at 2k for a bike, I would probably freak out.

And also, how do I handle the LBS, because I really liked the woman I was working with, and I want to use them for everything else - all the upgrades, maintenance, etc.

Thanks!

[Aggie_Ama]

I have a Cannondale Synapse Carbon and I love the fit. It is a 47 cm. Somehow I have not had any toe overlap issues on the tiny thing. The reach is very comfortable for me. Was the Cannondale a WSD?

Carbon will be easier to compromise, but I don't think it is going to be a problem with kids. My DH rides an aluminum Cannondale because if you wreck racing, the carbon would be easier to damage. We couldn't gamble with that at the price of bikes! You said you want to do group rides and leisure, carbon should be more comfortable the aluminum for that.

Your shop should understand that you have to ride what fits. Sure they want you to buy a bike, but the one I use is always friendly when people bring in other bikes. You are spending money there if you use them for service and accessories.

BTW- My second choice was a Ruby, so you can't go wrong with that!

[Trekhawk]

So now I'm leaning toward that option, which brings up another question - I've heard some people say that you have to be really, really careful with carbon because the frame integrity is easily compromised. Is this true? Because I have 3 kids and they aren't always as careful around things as I'd like them to be. And I don't know if I want to have a bike that I have to handle with kid gloves all the time. I take care of my things, but I don't want to freak out if it gets knocked over, KWIM? And at 2k for a bike, I would probably freak out.

Thanks!

I have two carbon bikes and three kids. What age are your kids??
Mine are 5, 7, and 9 but were 3, 5, and 7 when I first started riding. I just sat them down and explained to them that although my bikes looked like great things to play with they were not toys. They understand that I love my bikes and that it would make me very sad if any of my bikes got damaged by them. If they want to check something out on my bike they come ask me and we go look together. One of my bikes lives in the house and I have never had a problem. My kids are all boys and very active and my carbon bikes are surviving just fine.

[kan]

No, the Cannondale was not a WSD and I thought the shifter issue was a perfect example of the benefits of WSD.

My kids are 8, 4, and 2 - a boy and 2 girls in that order. I think they'd respect my wishes in that regard.

So if a newbie goes out and spends a lot on a bike, does that make me a ... what is it, a Fred? A Frederica? I don't really care what everyone thinks - I just want a bike that I'm going to love to ride, and I think the Ruby was that bike.

But to be sure I think I'll make a trip south and try out a few different bikes - a WSD Trek, for instance. It's hard, because I don't think I'll be able to do that for a few weeks, and I've got tax refund money that's just itching to be spent!

And I think I'll go try on the Ruby one more time, just for fun. Heh heh.

[KnottedYet]

Nope, if you spend the money on a bike because you LOVE it, no-one is gonna even think twice! What price love, eh?

But if you spend the money on a bike because you want to impress people, weeeeellllll, that's kinda goofy.

If you love the Ruby and it just feels right, (and if it fits your budget) don't be afraid! We all know what it is to get on a bike that just feels like "home." And believe me, sometimes that's hard to find!

[Crankin]

My first road bike was a Cannondale R600 WSD. The aluminum was a bumpy and uncomfortable ride. The lower end components gave me a lot of trouble, especially shifting. I never could get it into the big ring. I've owned 2 all carbon bikes since then and although you can't control what happens sometimes, I have had no issues with damage. I've had 2 crashes and nothing was damaged in either. My husband did snap his fork (on one side only, thankfully) when he crashed into a squirrel, descending at about 40 mph on a carbon bike. But since most aluminum bikes have carbon forks, that might have happened on any bike. I would go for the most bike for the $ and forgo some of the accessories, as others have stated. And hold off buying the aero bars. I know a lot of people who do tris and they don't have them.

[mimitabby]

btw, do go for that drive and try the Dolce. IT was explained to me by
the PT I went to (Erik Moen) that the basic geometry is the same as the Ruby.

The componentry is not the same of course, it's all cheaper, but I testrode one myself; it's a great little bike.

no one that i've heard from here is complaining about their Rubys though!